HGF β chain variants

ABSTRACT

The invention provides HGF/Met modulators comprising HGF having mutations in regions that affect HGF function, and antagonists that target said regions. The invention further provides methods of identifying, making and using these modulators.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser.No. 11/406,067, filed Apr. 17, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,737,115, whichis a non-provisional application filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b)(1), claimingpriority under 35 USC 119(e) to provisional application No. 60/671,610filed Apr. 15, 2005, the contents of which are incorporated herein intheir entirety by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to the fields of molecularbiology and growth factor regulation. More specifically, the inventionconcerns modulators of the HGF/c-met signaling pathway, and uses of saidmodulators.

BACKGROUND

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), also known as scatter factor (SF), isthe ligand for Met (Bottaro et al., 1991), a receptor tyrosine kinaseencoded by the c-met protooncogene (Cooper et al., 1984a &b). HGFbinding to Met induces phosphorylation of the intracellular kinasedomain resulting in activation of a complex set of intracellularpathways that lead to cell growth, differentiation and migration in avariety of cell types; several recently published reviews provide acomprehensive overview (Birchmeier et al., 2003; Trusolino and Comoglio,2002; Maulik et al., 2002). In addition to its fundamental importance inembryonic development and tissue regeneration, the HGF/Met signalingpathway has also been implicated in invasive tumor growth and metastasisand as such represents an interesting therapeutic target (Birchmeier etal., 2003; Trusolino and Comoglio, 2002; Danilkovitch-Miagkova and Zbar,2002; Ma et al., 2003).

HGF belongs to the plasminogen-related growth factor family andcomprises a 69 kDa α-chain containing the N-terminal finger domain (N)and four Kringle (K1-K4) domains, and a 34 kDa β-chain which has strongsimilarity to protease domains of chymotrypsin-like serine proteasesfrom Clan PA(S)/FamilyS1 (Nakamura et al., 1989; Donate et al., 1994;Rawlings et al., 2002). Like plasminogen and other serine proteasezymogens, HGF is secreted as a single chain precursor form (scHGF).scHGF binds to heparan sulfate proteoglycans, such as syndecan-1(Derksen et al., 2002) on cell surfaces or in the extracellular matrix.Heparan sulfate proteoglycans bind to the N domain (Hartmann et al.,1998), which also contributes to the high affinity Met binding togetherwith amino acids located in K1 (Lokker et al., 1994). Although scHGF isable to bind Met with high affinity, it cannot activate the receptor(Lokker et al., 1992; Hartmann et al., 1992). Acquisition of HGFsignaling activity is contingent upon proteolytic cleavage (activation)of scHGF at Arg494-Val495 resulting in the formation of mature HGF, adisulfide-linked α/β heterodimer (Lokker et al., 1992; Hartmann et al.,1992; Naldini et al., 1992). The protease-like domain of HGF (HGFβ-chain) is devoid of catalytic activity since it lacks the required Asp[c102]-His [c57]-Ser [c195] (standard chymotrypsinogen numbering inbrackets throughout) catalytic triad found in all serine proteases(Perona and Craik, 1995; Hedstrom, 2002), having a Gln534 [c57] andTyr673 [c195].

Because of its importance in regulating HGF activity, this process mustbe tightly controlled by HGF converting enzymes and their correspondingphysiological inhibitors. scHGF activation is mediated in vitro bychymotrypsin-like serine proteases including hepatocyte growth factoractivator (HGFA) (Miyazawa et al., 1993), matriptase/MT-SP1 (Takeuchi etal. 1999; Lin et al., 1999), urokinase-type plasminogen activator(Naldini et al., 1992), factor XIIa (Shimomura et al., 1995), factor XIa(Peek et al., 2002) and plasma kallikrein (Peek et al., 2002). Similarto scHGF, these proteases are produced as inactive precursors; theirenzymatic activities are also tightly regulated by other activatingproteases and both Kunitz- and serpin-type inhibitors.

Serine proteases and their activation process have been described(Donate et al., 1994). In serine proteases, activation cleavage of thezymogen effects a conformational rearrangement of the so-called‘activation domain’ giving rise to a properly formed active site and thesubstrate/inhibitor interaction region. The activation domainconstitutes three surface-exposed loops designated the [c140]-, [c180]-and [c220]-loops and insertion of the newly formed N-terminus into ahydrophobic pocket (Huber and Bode, 1978). In the homologousligand/receptor pair macrophage stimulating protein (MSP)/Ron, theserine protease-like MSP β-chain provides the main energy for receptorbinding (Wang et al., 1997; Miller and Leonard, 1998). This is reversedfrom the HGF/Met system where the high affinity receptor binding sitefor Met resides in the HGF α-chain (Lokker et al., 1994; Okigaki et al.,1992).

The importance of the HGF/Met signaling axis in normal cellular functionand in the etiology of clinical disorders suggests the need to develophighly effective therapeutic means based on modulation of this axis. Thecomplexity of this pathway, however, particularly in light of the lesswell-understood mechanism of HGF-HGF and HGF/Met interactions, hasslowed progress on this front and highlighted the need to developapproaches that are based on better understanding of the mechanism ofaction of the HGF-HGF and HGF/Met interactions. The invention disclosedhereinbelow fulfills this need and provides other benefits.

All references cited herein, including patent applications andpublications, are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a plasminogen-related growth factor,binds to its receptor tyrosine kinase Met (also referred to herein asC-Met, c-Met or c-met), which is implicated in development, tissueregeneration and invasive tumor growth. The serine protease-like HGFβ-chain itself binds to Met. Other than binding to Met, it is not clearwhat regions and specific residues in the HGF β chain are necessary toeffect proper signaling through the HGF/Met pathway. We predicted thatcertain regions/positions within the β chain make importantcontributions to proper HGF functional activity, wherein thesecontributions may or may not involve binding of HGF β chain to itscognate receptor. The results described herein provide evidence thatmutations in the N terminal region and/or dimerization region of HGF βchain can disrupt HGF/Met biological function, with or withoutsubstantially impairing HGF (in particular HGF β chain) binding toC-Met. In general but not necessarily, these mutations do not implicatepositions thought to comprise the ‘activation domain’ or ‘active siteregion’ of wild type HGF.

Mutation analyses described herein provide a basis for design of amultitude of HGF mutants capable of inhibiting wild type HGF/HGF andHGF/c-met interactions across a spectrum of potencies. Examples of suchmutants are described herein. These mutants are capable of competingwith wild type HGF for binding to c-met, yet exhibit reduced ability toeffect c-met associated biological functions. This is particularlyadvantageous where complete or substantial inhibition of the HGF/c-metaxis is undesirable; this is of particular concern because HGF and c-metare ubiquitously expressed in normal cells and tissues. These mutantscan also be used as advantageous therapeutic agents for treatingpathological conditions wherein reduced, but not complete absence of,HGF/c-met biological activity is desirable. Methods and compositions ofthe invention are based at least in part on these findings, which aredescribed in greater detail below.

In one aspect, the invention provides an HGF/C-Met antagonist moleculecomprising an HGF mutant comprising a mutation in HGF β chain N terminalregion and/or HGF β chain dimerization region.

A mutation in the HGF β chain N terminal region can be any that impairsinsertion of HGF β chain N-terminus into an HGF binding pocket. In oneembodiment, the resulting HGF β chain mutant binds to C-Met with reducedbinding affinity compared to wild type HGF β chain. In one embodiment,the resulting HGF β chain mutant binds to C-Met with substantiallyequivalent affinity as wild type HGF β chain. In one embodiment, theresulting full-length HGF containing a mutated HGF β chain binds toC-Met with reduced binding affinity compared to full-length wild typeHGF. In one embodiment, the resulting full-length HGF containing amutated HGF β chain binds to C-Met with substantially equivalentaffinity as full-length wild type HGF. In one embodiment, a mutation isin or adjacent to the P1′ position (i.e., 495 [c16]), wherein themutation results in a cleavable HGF mutant, and wherein the N-terminusof HGF β chain does not insert into an active site/binding pocket.Examples for inability to insert into an active site/binding pocketinclude, but are not limited, to configurations wherein the mutant isdefective in either or both (i) hydrophobic interactions, and (ii)formation of salt bridge involving the N-terminus to Asp672 [c]194,e.g., where an N-terminus bears a mutation, e.g., a positively-chargedsubstituted or inserted amino acid residue. In one embodiment, signalingvia this mutant is impaired. In one embodiment, a mutation is in oradjacent to one or more of positions P1′, P2′, P3′ and P4′.

A mutation in the HGF β chain dimerization domain can be any that wouldbe expected to impair contact between two HGF β chains such thatdimerization of the two chains (and thus two HGF molecules) is impaired.Such mutations would be evident from the amino acid structure of HGFcomplexes, for example, as described in Kirchhofer et al., J Biol Chem.(2004), 279(38):39915-24. Relevant amino acid positions include, but arenot limited to, those described herein. In one embodiment, the resultingHGF mutant has reduced ability to dimerize with another HGF β chain. Inone embodiment, a mutation in HGF β chain dimerization region does notsubstantially impair binding of the resulting HGF mutant to C-Met.

Dimerization domain refers to a region of a HGF β chain that interactswith another HGF β chain to form a dimer (e.g., in a HGF/Met activationcomplex). Upon cleavage of proHGF, the HGF β chain undergoes aconformational change. The HGF β chain N-terminal residue 495 forms asalt bridge with residue Asp 672. In some embodiments, the dimerizationregion of an HGF β comprises, consists essentially of, or consists of atleast one amino acid residue (up to all amino acid residues)corresponding to residues of HGF β from about 495 to 502, the [c140loop] amino acids including Y619, T620, G621, the [c180] loop aminoacids including 662 to 665, or mixtures thereof In one embodiment, thedimerization domain includes positions located close/adjacent to one ormore of the positions listed above and thus are predicted to influencesaid one or more positions. For example, in this embodiment, thedimerization domain may further include positions 622 and 626.

In one aspect, an HGF/Met antagonist molecule of the invention comprisesa mutation in HGF β chain N terminal region, wherein the mutation is inposition V495, G498, R502 plus T503, and/or D672. A mutation can be inany form that alters the primary, secondary and/or tertiary structure ofthe N terminal region of HGF β chain. For example, in one embodiment, amutation in HGF β chain N terminal region is a substitution, insertionand/or deletion, such as V495G, V495A, G498I, G498P, G498V, R502del plusT503del, or D672N. In another embodiment, a mutation in HGF β chain Nterminal region is a deletion of V495. A mutation that alters theprimary, secondary and/or tertiary structure of the N terminal region ofHGF β chain can also be in an amino acid position that is not in the HGFβ chain N terminal region itself For example, a mutation of D672 thatremoves salt bridge formation (e.g., D672N) with HGF β chain N terminuswould also be expected to alter the primary, secondary and/or tertiarystructure of the HGF β chain N terminal region. Thus, mutations of theHGF β chain N terminal region and HGF β chain dimerization region arenot necessarily mutually exclusive. For example, as described herein,and exemplified in FIG. 1, mutation in certain positions may be expectedto affect both the N terminal and dimerization domains of HGF β chain.

In one aspect, an HGF/Met antagonist molecule of the invention comprisesa mutation in HGF β chain dimerization domain, wherein the mutation isin position N497, G498, P500, at or adjacent to T501 and R502, or R502.A mutation can be in any form that alters the primary, secondary and/ortertiary structure of the dimerization region of HGF β chain. Examplesof mutations that would alter the structure of the dimerization regionof the HGF β chain include mutations that introduce a residue that ischarged or has a large side-chain (e.g., bulky) into the wild-typesequence, whereby a charged residue may result in repulsive interactionsand a large side chain may result in adverse steric interactions.Furthermore, cysteine mutations (e.g., L622C, I664C, P500C, and N497C)can also be introduced that are available for modification by specificthiol alkylating reagents such as those containing maleimide andhaloacetyl groups. In one embodiment, a mutation in HGF β chaindimerization region is a substitution, insertion and/or deletion, suchas N497R or K; G498A or S; P500W, H or E; insertion between T501 andR502 (e.g., an insertion of R and/or S); or R502del. In one embodiment,a mutation at position N497 is not N497F, A or E. In one embodiment, amutation is in one or more of positions 495 to 503, wherein such amutation could alter HGF β chain dimerization and/or binding toreceptor. In another embodiment, mutations that affect the dimerizationdomain can be combined with mutation in one or more positions outside ofthe dimerization domain, e.g., a mutation at or adjacent to the 494-495cleavage site. For example, in a mutant that would be expected to benoncleavable (e.g. R494E:V495G double mutant) and that also contains amutation in the dimerization domain, such a mutant would nonethelessexhibit impaired biological function even if does get cleaved in vivo.

In some embodiments of an HGF/Met antagonist molecule of the invention,the molecule comprises wild type amino acids at position 534, 578, 619,673, 692, 693, 694, 695, 696, 699, and/or 702. In some embodiments ofHGF/Met antagonists of the invention, the antagonists comprise mutationsat position L622 (e.g., L622C or K); I623 (e.g., I623C); D626 (e.g.,D626K); L622 plus D626 (e.g., L622K plus D626K); K663 (e.g., K663C);I664 (e.g., I664C); R502 (e.g., 502C); P500 (e.g., P500C); N497 (e.g.,N497C); R494 plus I623 (e.g., R494E plus I623C); N497 plus G498 (e.g.,N497R plus G498A, or N497K plus G498A); N497 plus P500 (e.g., N497R plusP500H, or N497K plus P500H); G498 plus P500 (e.g., G498A plus P500H);N497 plus G498 plus P500 (e.g., N497R plus G498A plus P500H, or N497Kplus G498A plus P500H); N497 plus L622 (e.g., N497R plus L622K, or N497Kplus L622K); N497 plus D626 (e.g., N497R plus D626K, or N497K plusD626K); N497 plus L622 plus D626 (e.g., N497R plus L622K plus D626K, orN497K plus L622K plus D626K).

In one embodiment, an HGF/Met antagonist molecule of the inventioncomprises a mutation in the HGF active site alone or in combination withone or more of the mutations described herein. Mutations of the activesite include mutations at position 667 and/or 704. Suitable mutationsinclude substitution of one or both of these positions with a C or a W.

In general, an HGF/Met antagonist molecule of the invention comprises anHGF molecule having a mutation in the HGF β chain that reduces one ormore of the biological characteristics normally associated with wildtype HGF. For example, in one embodiment, the molecule has reduced C-Metsignaling capability (e.g., Met phorphorylation) compared to wild typeHGF. In another embodiment, the molecule has reduced ability tostimulate cell migration compared to wild type HGF. In anotherembodiment, the molecule has reduced ability to stimulate cellproliferation compared to wild type HGF. In another embodiment, themolecule has reduced ability to stimulate angiogenesis compared to wildtype HGF. An HGF/Met antagonist molecule of the invention generallycomprises at least a portion of the HGF a chain that is involved inbinding to Met, linked to a mutated HGF β chain as described herein.

As shown by the mutational analysis described herein, certain regions,and specific amino acid positions therein, in HGF β chain play importantroles in modulating HGF biological functions. Accordingly, in oneaspect, the invention also provides HGF/Met modulators that specificallytarget these regions. Such modulators include nucleic acids such asaptamer, and polypeptides such as binding peptides and antibodies.

As used herein, the letter before a number indicates the correspondingwild type amino acid found at the amino acid position denoted by thatnumber in a wild type human HGF polypeptide, and the letter(s) (ifpresent) after the number indicates the mutation type/amino acid (e.g.,substitution amino acid, deletion (del) or insertion (ins)).

In one aspect, the invention provides an HGF mutant that has HGF/c-metmodulatory activity, e.g. an antagonist of HGF/c-met activity or an HGFvariant exhibiting a reduction, but not an absence, of HGF biologicalactivity (e.g., cell growth stimulatory activity). In one embodiment, anantagonist of the invention is capable of inhibiting the biologicalactivity of wild type HGF in vivo or in vitro (such biological activityincludes but is not limited to receptor phosphorylation, stimulation ofcell proliferation, enhancement of cell survival, promotion ofangiogenesis, induction/promotion of cell migration). In one embodiment,an HGF mutant provides reduced cell growth promoting activity (e.g.,cell proliferation, cell survival, angiogenic, cell migration).

In one embodiment, an antagonist molecule of the invention competes withwild type HGF for binding to Met. In some of the embodiments, saidmolecule inhibits c-met receptor multimerization (e.g., dimerization).In some embodiments, said molecule comprises a variant (mutant) β chainhaving reduced ability to interact (e.g., multimerize/dimerize) withanother β chain molecule. In some embodiments, said molecule inhibitsHGF β chain multimerization (e.g., dimerization). In some embodiments,said molecule binds to c-met but exhibits reduced ability to effectc-met activation (e.g., as indicated by reduced c-met phosphorylation,mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation, and/or reducedHGF/c-met dependent cell migration, cell proliferation, cell survival,cell morphogenesis, angiogenesis etc.).

In any molecule of the invention wherein one or more positions ismutated relative to the wild type counterpart sequence, the mutation canbe of any form that alters the functional effect of the correspondingwild type residue. A mutation can be obtained in any suitable form knownin the art (and/or determined empirically), e.g. by substitution,insertion, addition and/or deletion. In some embodiments, a mutationcomprises a non-conservative substitution. Suitable substitutionsinclude but are not limited to those described herein (in particular inthe Examples), e.g. with amino acids such as alanine and serine.

In one aspect, a molecule/substance (e.g., HGF/c-met modulators asdescribed herein) is linked to a toxin such as a cytotoxic agent. Thesemolecules/substances can be formulated or administered in combinationwith an additive/enhancing agent, such as a radiation and/orchemotherapeutic agent.

The invention also provides methods and compositions useful formodulating disease states associated with dysregulation of the HGF/c-metsignaling axis. Thus, in one aspect, the invention provides a method ofmodulating c-met activation in a subject, said method comprisingadministering to the subject an HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of theinvention, whereby c-met activation is modulated. In one embodiment,said molecule is an HGF/c-met antagonist that inhibits HGF/c-metactivity. In one embodiment, said antagonist inhibits specific bindingof wild type HGF β to c-met. In one aspect, the invention provides amethod of treating a pathological condition associated with activationof c-met in a subject, said method comprising administering to thesubject a c-met antagonist of the invention, whereby c-met activation isinhibited.

The HGF/c-met signaling pathway is involved in multiple biological andphysiological functions, including, e.g., cell growth stimulation (e.g.cell proliferation, cell survival, cell migration, cell morphogenesis)and angiogenesis. Thus, in another aspect, the invention provides amethod of inhibiting c-met activated cell growth (e.g. proliferationand/or survival), said method comprising contacting a cell or tissuewith an antagonist of the invention, whereby cell proliferationassociated with c-met activation is inhibited. In yet another aspect,the invention provides a method of inhibiting angiogenesis, said methodcomprising administering to a cell, tissue, and/or subject with acondition associated with abnormal angiogenesis an HGF/Met antagonist ofthe invention, whereby angiogenesis is inhibited.

In one aspect, the invention provides use of an antagonist of theinvention in the preparation of a medicament for the therapeutic and/orprophylactic treatment of a disease, such as a cancer, a tumor, a cellproliferative disorder, an immune (such as autoimmune) disorder and/oran angiogenesis-related disorder. The antagonist can be of any formdescribed herein, including antibody, antibody fragment, polypeptide(e.g., an oligopeptide, HGF polypeptide mutant/variant), nucleic acid(aptamer), or combination thereof

In one aspect, the invention provides use of a nucleic acid of theinvention in the preparation of a medicament for the therapeutic and/orprophylactic treatment of a disease, such as a cancer, a tumor, a cellproliferative disorder, an immune (such as autoimmune) disorder and/oran angiogenesis-related disorder.

In one aspect, the invention provides use of an expression vector of theinvention in the preparation of a medicament for the therapeutic and/orprophylactic treatment of a disease, such as a cancer, a tumor, a cellproliferative disorder, an immune (such as autoimmune) disorder and/oran angiogenesis-related disorder.

In one aspect, the invention provides use of a host cell of theinvention in the preparation of a medicament for the therapeutic and/orprophylactic treatment of a disease, such as a cancer, a tumor, a cellproliferative disorder, an immune (such as autoimmune) disorder and/oran angiogenesis-related disorder.

In one aspect, the invention provides use of an article of manufactureof the invention in the preparation of a medicament for the therapeuticand/or prophylactic treatment of a disease, such as a cancer, a tumor, acell proliferative disorder, an immune (such as autoimmune) disorderand/or an angiogenesis-related disorder.

In one aspect, the invention provides use of a kit of the invention inthe preparation of a medicament for the therapeutic and/or prophylactictreatment of a disease, such as a cancer, a tumor, a cell proliferativedisorder, an immune (such as autoimmune) disorder and/or anangiogenesis-related disorder.

In one aspect, the invention provides a method of inhibiting c-metactivated cell proliferation, said method comprising contacting a cellor tissue with an effective amount of an antagonist of the invention,whereby cell proliferation associated with c-met activation isinhibited.

In one aspect, the invention provides a method of treating apathological condition associated with dysregulation of c-met activationin a subject, said method comprising administering to the subject aneffective amount of an antagonist of the invention, whereby saidcondition is treated.

In one aspect, the invention provides a method of inhibiting the growthof a cell that expresses c-met or hepatocyte growth factor, or both,said method comprising contacting said cell with a c-met antagonist ofthe invention thereby causing an inhibition of growth of said cell. Inone embodiment, the cell is contacted by HGF expressed by a differentcell (e.g., through a paracrine effect).

In one aspect, the invention provides a method of therapeuticallytreating a mammal having a cancerous tumor comprising a cell thatexpresses c-met or hepatocyte growth factor, or both, said methodcomprising administering to said mammal an effective amount of anantagonist of the invention, thereby effectively treating said mammal.In one embodiment, the cell is contacted by HGF expressed by a differentcell (e.g., through a paracrine effect).

In one aspect, the invention provides a method for treating orpreventing a cell proliferative disorder associated with increasedexpression or activity of c-met or hepatocyte growth factor, or both,said method comprising administering to a subject in need of suchtreatment an effective amount of an antagonist of the invention, therebyeffectively treating or preventing said cell proliferative disorder. Inone embodiment, said proliferative disorder is cancer.

In one aspect, the invention provides a method for inhibiting the growthof a cell, wherein growth of said cell is at least in part dependentupon a growth potentiating effect of c-met or hepatocyte growth factor,or both, said method comprising contacting said cell with an effectiveamount of an antagonist of the invention, thereby inhibiting the growthof said cell. In one embodiment, the cell is contacted by HGF expressedby a different cell (e.g., through a paracrine effect).

In one aspect, the invention provides a method of therapeuticallytreating a tumor in a mammal, wherein the growth of said tumor is atleast in part dependent upon a growth potentiating effect of c-met orhepatocyte growth factor, or both, said method comprising contactingsaid cell with an effective amount of an antagonist of the invention,thereby effectively treating said tumor. In one embodiment, the cell iscontacted by HGF expressed by a different cell (e.g., through aparacrine effect).

Methods of the invention can be used to affect any suitable pathologicalstate, for example, cells and/or tissues associated with dysregulationof the HGF/c-met signaling pathway. In one embodiment, a cell that istargeted in a method of the invention is a cancer cell. For example, acancer cell can be one selected from the group consisting of a breastcancer cell, a colorectal cancer cell, a lung cancer cell, a papillarycarcinoma cell (e.g., of the thyroid gland), a colon cancer cell, apancreatic cancer cell, an ovarian cancer cell, a cervical cancer cell,a central nervous system cancer cell, an osteogenic sarcoma cell, arenal carcinoma cell, a hepatocellular carcinoma cell, a bladder cancercell, a gastric carcinoma cell, a head and neck squamous carcinoma cell,a melanoma cell, a mulitiple myeloma cell, and a leukemia cell. In oneembodiment, a cell that is targeted in a method of the invention is ahyperproliferative and/or hyperplastic cell. In one embodiment, a cellthat is targeted in a method of the invention is a dysplastic cell. Inyet another embodiment, a cell that is targeted in a method of theinvention is a metastatic cell.

Methods of the invention can further comprise additional treatmentsteps. For example, in one embodiment, a method further comprises a stepwherein a targeted cell and/or tissue (e.g., a cancer cell) is exposedto radiation treatment or a chemotherapeutic agent. In one embodiment,an HGF/Met antagonist molecule of the invention is administered to asubject in combination with one or more other therapeutic agent, forexample erlotinib (TARCEVA®), pemetrexed (ALIMTA®), bevacizumab(AVASTIN®), gefitinib (IRESSA®), trastuzumab (HERCEPTIN®), and rituximab(RITUXAN®). Administration of therapeutic agents in combination therapycan occur concurrently or sequentially.

As described herein, c-met activation is an important biological processthe dysregulation of which leads to numerous pathological conditions.Accordingly, in one embodiment of methods of the invention, a cell thatis targeted (e.g., a cancer cell) is one in which activation of c-met isenhanced as compared to a normal cell of the same tissue origin. In oneembodiment, a method of the invention causes the death of a targetedcell. For example, contact with an antagonist of the invention mayresult in a cell's inability to signal through the c-met pathway, whichresults in cell death.

Dysregulation of c-met activation (and thus signaling) can result from anumber of cellular changes, including, for example, overexpression ofHGF (c-met's cognate ligand) and/or c-met itself Accordingly, in someembodiments, a method of the invention comprises targeting a cellwherein c-met or hepatoctye growth factor, or both, is more abundantlyexpressed by said cell (e.g., a cancer cell) as compared to a normalcell of the same tissue origin. A c-met-expressing cell can be regulatedby HGF from a variety of sources, i.e. in an autocrine or paracrinemanner. For example, in one embodiment of methods of the invention, atargeted cell is contacted/bound by hepatocyte growth factor expressedin a different cell (e.g., via a paracrine effect). Said different cellcan be of the same or of a different tissue origin. In one embodiment, atargeted cell is contacted/bound by HGF expressed by the targeted cellitself (e.g., via an autocrine effect/loop).

In some embodiments, HGF/Met antagonists of the invention comprise HGFmutants that comprise modifications that enhance their inhibitory and/ortherapeutic effect (including, e g , enhanced affinity, improvedpharmacokinetics properties (such as half life, stability, clearancerate), reduced toxicity to the subject). Such modifications include,e.g., modifications involving glycosylation, pegylation, substitutionwith non-naturally occurring but functionally equivalent amino acid,linking groups, etc. Suitable modifications are well known in the art,and furthermore can be determined empirically as necessary.

In one aspect, the invention provides compositions comprising one ormore HGF/c-met antagonists of the invention and a carrier. In oneembodiment, the carrier is pharmaceutically acceptable.

In one aspect, the invention provides nucleic acids encoding a HGF/c-metantagonist of the invention. In one embodiment, a nucleic acid of theinvention encodes a HGF/c-met antagonist which is or comprises apolypeptide (e.g., an HGF mutant/variant). In one embodiment, a nucleicacid of the invention encodes a HGF/c-met antagonist which is orcomprises an antibody or fragment thereof

In one aspect, the invention provides vectors comprising a nucleic acidof the invention.

In one aspect, the invention provides host cells comprising a nucleicacid or a vector of the invention. A vector can be of any type, forexample a recombinant vector such as an expression vector. Any of avariety of host cells can be used. In one embodiment, a host cell is aprokaryotic cell, for example, E. coli. In one embodiment, a host cellis a eukaryotic cell, for example a mammalian cell such as ChineseHamster Ovary (CHO) cell.

In one aspect, the invention provides methods for making a HGF/c-metantagonist of the invention. For example, the invention provides amethod of making an antagonist which is or comprises an antibody (orfragment thereof), said method comprising expressing in a suitable hostcell a recombinant vector of the invention encoding said antibody (orfragment thereof), and recovering said antibody. In another example, theinvention provides a method of making a HGF/c-met antagonist which is orcomprises a polypeptide (such as an HGF mutant/variant), said methodcomprising expressing in a suitable host cell a recombinant vector ofthe invention encoding said polypeptide, and recovering saidpolypeptide.

In one aspect, the invention provides an article of manufacturecomprising a container; and a composition contained within thecontainer, wherein the composition comprises one or more HGF/c-metantagonists of the invention. In one embodiment, the compositioncomprises a nucleic acid of the invention. In one embodiment, acomposition comprising a HGF/c-met antagonist further comprises acarrier, which in some embodiments is pharmaceutically acceptable. Inone embodiment, an article of manufacture of the invention furthercomprises instructions for administering the composition to a subject.

In one aspect, the invention provides a kit comprising a first containercomprising a composition comprising one or more HGF/c-met antagonists ofthe invention; and a second container comprising a buffer. In oneembodiment, the buffer is pharmaceutically acceptable. In oneembodiment, a composition comprising an HGF/c-met antagonist furthercomprises a carrier, which in some embodiments is pharmaceuticallyacceptable. In one embodiment, a kit further comprises instructions foradministering the composition to a subject.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 (A) depicts characterization of various HGF mutants. Both HGF βchain N-terminal insertion and HGF β chain dimerization mutants areexemplified. “Cell Migration” data relate to migration of MDA-MB435cells in the presence of full-length HGF containing the indicatedmutation(s), expressed as percentage of migration in the presence ofwild-type HGF. “HGF β/MetIgG Binding” data relate to binding of HGF βchain (containing the indicated mutation(s)) to MetIgG, expressed as theratio of IC₅₀ (mutant) to IC₅₀ (wild-type) in a competition bindingassay. In these data, WT refers to the C604S mutant; HGF β mutants alsocontained this mutation. Note: As a general reference, mutations areindicated in bold if they are expected to disrupt potential β chain-βchain interactions, and mutations are indicated in italics andunderlined (bold or unbold) if they are expected to disrupt insertion ofthe N-terminus. These expectations are based on the predominant effectobserved or expected for the respective mutations—i.e., effect on eitherβ chain-β chain interactions or ability of the β chain N-terminus toinsert into an active site/binding pocket. Notwithstanding this, theskilled practitioner would readily be able to determine whether aparticular mutation would have one or both effects, whether indicated assuch or not in FIG. 1A. For example, in some instances, a mutation mayaffect both β chain-β chain interactions and insertion of theN-terminus, or in some instances a mutation indicated in FIG. 1A asexpected to affect β chain-βchain interactions may empirically be shownto affect insertion of the N-terminus. Similarly, apparently “impaired”Met binding values are indicated in italics, and apparently “normal”binding values are indicated in bold text, although the degree of“impairment” and “normality” is relative.

(B) Binding of full-length HGF containing the indicated mutation(s) toMet as measured in a competition binding assay. Data are expressed asthe ratio of IC₅₀ (mut) to IC₅₀ (wild-type).

(C) Inhibition of cell migration and proliferation by full-length HGFcontaining the indicated mutation(s). Amount of cell migration andproliferation activity, respectively, in the presence of mutant HGF andwild-type HGF (1 nM wild type HGF for migration; 0.25 nM wild type HGFfor proliferation) is expressed as a percentage of activity observed inthe presence of wild type HGF alone.

FIG. 2 (A) Inhibition of HGF-dependent Met phosphorylation in A549 cellsby HGF mutants as indicated; R424A:R494E refers to single-chain HGF.Amount of Met phosphorylation is indicated as RLU (relative light unit).(B) Inhibition of HGF-dependent Met phosphorylation in A549 lungcarcinoma cells by HGF mutants as indicated. Amount of Metphosphorylation is indicated as a percentage of control (which is theamount observed in the presence of 0.5 nM wild-type HGF).

FIGS. 3(A) and (B) Phosphorylation of Met in A549 cells in the presenceof wild-type and mutant HGF. Amount of Met phosphorylation is indicatedas a percentage of maximum phosphorylation observed in the presence ofwild type HGF at each of the respective wild-type HGF concentrations.

FIG. 4 Angiogenic activity in the presence of mutant HGF. Amount ofangiogenesis is indicated as number of sprouts/bead in the presence ofHGF mutants as indicated.

MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

The invention provides methods, compositions, kits and articles ofmanufacture for modulating the HGF/c-met signaling pathway.

Details of these methods, compositions, kits and articles of manufactureare provided herein.

General Techniques

The practice of the present invention will employ, unless otherwiseindicated, conventional techniques of molecular biology (includingrecombinant techniques), microbiology, cell biology, biochemistry, andimmunology, which are within the skill of the art. Such techniques areexplained fully in the literature, such as, “Molecular Cloning: ALaboratory Manual”, second edition (Sambrook et al., 1989);“Oligonucleotide Synthesis” (M. J. Gait, ed., 1984); “Animal CellCulture” (R. I. Freshney, ed., 1987); “Methods in Enzymology” (AcademicPress, Inc.); “Current Protocols in Molecular Biology” (F. M. Ausubel etal., eds., 1987, and periodic updates); “PCR: The Polymerase ChainReaction”, (Mullis et al., ed., 1994); “A Practical Guide to MolecularCloning” (Perbal Bernard V., 1988).

Definitions

As employed herein, references to amino acid names may be theart-accepted designations in one or more of the following forms, all ofwhich are used interchangeably herein: (i) full name (e.g., tryptophan,serine, glycine, etc.), (ii) three-letter abbreviations (e.g., Trp, Ser,Gly, etc.), and (iii) one-letter designations (e.g., W, S, G, etc.).

“Percent (%) amino acid sequence identity” with respect to a peptide orpolypeptide sequence is defined as the percentage of amino acid residuesin a candidate sequence that are identical with the amino acid residuesin the specific peptide or polypeptide sequence, after aligning thesequences and introducing gaps, if necessary, to achieve the maximumpercent sequence identity, and not considering any conservativesubstitutions as part of the sequence identity. Alignment for purposesof determining percent amino acid sequence identity can be achieved invarious ways that are within the skill in the art, for instance, usingpublicly available computer software such as BLAST, BLAST-2, ALIGN orMegalign (DNASTAR) software. Those skilled in the art can determineappropriate parameters for measuring alignment, including any algorithmsneeded to achieve maximal alignment over the full length of thesequences being compared. For purposes herein, however, % amino acidsequence identity values are generated using the sequence comparisoncomputer program ALIGN-2, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,828,146.

As used herein, the terms “peptide” and “polypeptide” are usedinterchangeably, except that the term “peptide” generally refers topolypeptide comprising fewer than 200 contiguous amino acids. The term“peptide” generally refers to a contiguous and relatively short sequenceof amino acids linked by peptidyl bonds. Typically, but not necessarily,a peptide has a length of about 2 to 50 amino acids, 4-40 amino acids or10-30 amino acids.

The term “vector,” as used herein, is intended to refer to a nucleicacid molecule capable of transporting another nucleic acid to which ithas been linked. One type of vector is a “plasmid”, which refers to acircular double stranded DNA loop into which additional DNA segments maybe ligated. Another type of vector is a phage vector. Another type ofvector is a viral vector, wherein additional DNA segments may be ligatedinto the viral genome. Certain vectors are capable of autonomousreplication in a host cell into which they are introduced (e.g.,bacterial vectors having a bacterial origin of replication and episomalmammalian vectors). Other vectors (e.g., non-episomal mammalian vectors)can be integrated into the genome of a host cell upon introduction intothe host cell, and thereby are replicated along with the host genome.Moreover, certain vectors are capable of directing the expression ofgenes to which they are operatively linked. Such vectors are referred toherein as “recombinant expression vectors” (or simply, “recombinantvectors”). In general, expression vectors of utility in recombinant DNAtechniques are often in the form of plasmids. In the presentspecification, “plasmid” and “vector” may be used interchangeably as theplasmid is the most commonly used form of vector.

“Polynucleotide,” or “nucleic acid,” as used interchangeably herein,refer to polymers of nucleotides of any length, and include DNA and RNA.The nucleotides can be deoxyribonucleotides, ribonucleotides, modifiednucleotides or bases, and/or their analogs, or any substrate that can beincorporated into a polymer by DNA or RNA polymerase, or by a syntheticreaction. A polynucleotide may comprise modified nucleotides, such asmethylated nucleotides and their analogs. If present, modification tothe nucleotide structure may be imparted before or after assembly of thepolymer. The sequence of nucleotides may be interrupted bynon-nucleotide components. A polynucleotide may be further modifiedafter synthesis, such as by conjugation with a label. Other types ofmodifications include, for example, “caps”, substitution of one or moreof the naturally occurring nucleotides with an analog, internucleotidemodifications such as, for example, those with uncharged linkages (e.g.,methyl phosphonates, phosphotriesters, phosphoamidates, carbamates,etc.) and with charged linkages (e.g., phosphorothioates,phosphorodithioates, etc.), those containing pendant moieties, such as,for example, proteins (e.g., nucleases, toxins, antibodies, signalpeptides, ply-L-lysine, etc.), those with intercalators (e.g., acridine,psoralen, etc.), those containing chelators (e.g., metals, radioactivemetals, boron, oxidative metals, etc.), those containing alkylators,those with modified linkages (e.g., alpha anomeric nucleic acids, etc.),as well as unmodified forms of the polynucleotide(s). Further, any ofthe hydroxyl groups ordinarily present in the sugars may be replaced,for example, by phosphonate groups, phosphate groups, protected bystandard protecting groups, or activated to prepare additional linkagesto additional nucleotides, or may be conjugated to solid or semi-solidsupports. The 5′ and 3′ terminal OH can be phosphorylated or substitutedwith amines or organic capping group moieties of from 1 to 20 carbonatoms. Other hydroxyls may also be derivatized to standard protectinggroups. Polynucleotides can also contain analogous forms of ribose ordeoxyribose sugars that are generally known in the art, including, forexample, 2′-O-methyl-, 2′-O-allyl, 2′-fluoro- or 2′-azido-ribose,carbocyclic sugar analogs, .alpha.-anomeric sugars, epimeric sugars suchas arabinose, xyloses or lyxoses, pyranose sugars, furanose sugars,sedoheptuloses, acyclic analogs and abasic nucleoside analogs such asmethyl riboside. One or more phosphodiester linkages may be replaced byalternative linking groups. These alternative linking groups include,but are not limited to, embodiments wherein phosphate is replaced byP(O)S(“thioate”), P(S)S (“dithioate”), “(O)NR.sub.2 (“amidate”), P(O)R,P(O)OR′, CO or CH.sub.2 (“formacetal”), in which each R or R′ isindependently H or substituted or unsubstituted alkyl (1-20 C.)optionally containing an ether (—O—) linkage, aryl, alkenyl, cycloalkyl,cycloalkenyl or araldyl. Not all linkages in a polynucleotide need beidentical. The preceding description applies to all polynucleotidesreferred to herein, including RNA and DNA.

“Oligonucleotide,” as used herein, generally refers to short, generallysingle stranded, generally synthetic polynucleotides that are generally,but not necessarily, less than about 200 nucleotides in length. Theterms “oligonucleotide” and “polynucleotide” are not mutually exclusive.The description above for polynucleotides is equally and fullyapplicable to oligonucleotides.

The term “hepatocyte growth factor” or “HGF”, as used herein, refers,unless specifically indicated otherwise, to any native or variant(whether native or synthetic) HGF polypeptide that is capable ofactivating the HGF/c-met signaling pathway under conditions that permitsuch process to occur. The term “wild type HGF” generally refers to apolypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of a naturally occurringHGF protein. Thet term “wild type HGF sequence” generally refers to anamino acid sequence found in a naturally occurring HGF.

The phrase “does not substantially impair”, “does not substantiallyreduce”, “are substantially similar” or “are substantially equivalent”,and variations thereof, as used herein, denotes a sufficiently highdegree of similarity between two numeric values such that one of skillin the art would consider the difference between the two values to be oflittle or no biological significance within the context of thebiological characteristic measured by said values. The differencebetween said two values is preferably less than about 50%, preferablyless than about 40%, preferably less than about 30%, preferably lessthan about 20%, preferably less than about 10%. Examples of “two numericvalues” include a value associated with a wild type protein and a valueassociated with a mutated form of said protein.

The terms “antibody” and “immunoglobulin” are used interchangeably inthe broadest sense and include monoclonal antibodies (e.g., full lengthor intact monoclonal antibodies), polyclonal antibodies, multivalentantibodies, multispecific antibodies (e.g., bispecific antibodies solong as they exhibit the desired biological activity) and may alsoinclude certain antibody fragments (as described in greater detailherein). An antibody can be human, humanized and/or affinity matured.

“Antibody fragments” comprise only a portion of an intact antibody,wherein the portion preferably retains at least one, preferably most orall, of the functions normally associated with that portion when presentin an intact antibody. In one embodiment, an antibody fragment comprisesan antigen binding site of the intact antibody and thus retains theability to bind antigen. In another embodiment, an antibody fragment,for example one that comprises the Fc region, retains at least one ofthe biological functions normally associated with the Fc region whenpresent in an intact antibody, such as FcRn binding, antibody half lifemodulation, ADCC function and complement binding. In one embodiment, anantibody fragment is a monovalent antibody that has an in vivo half lifesubstantially similar to an intact antibody. For example, such anantibody fragment may comprise on antigen binding arm linked to an Fcsequence capable of conferring in vivo stability to the fragment.

The term “monoclonal antibody” as used herein refers to an antibodyobtained from a population of substantially homogeneous antibodies,i.e., the individual antibodies comprising the population are identicalexcept for possible naturally occurring mutations that may be present inminor amounts. Monoclonal antibodies are highly specific, being directedagainst a single antigen. Furthermore, in contrast to polyclonalantibody preparations that typically include different antibodiesdirected against different determinants (epitopes), each monoclonalantibody is directed against a single determinant on the antigen.

The monoclonal antibodies herein specifically include “chimeric”antibodies in which a portion of the heavy and/or light chain isidentical with or homologous to corresponding sequences in antibodiesderived from a particular species or belonging to a particular antibodyclass or subclass, while the remainder of the chain(s) is identical withor homologous to corresponding sequences in antibodies derived fromanother species or belonging to another antibody class or subclass, aswell as fragments of such antibodies, so long as they exhibit thedesired biological activity (U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567; and Morrison etal., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:6851-6855 (1984)).

“Humanized” forms of non-human (e.g., murine) antibodies are chimericantibodies that contain minimal sequence derived from non-humanimmunoglobulin. For the most part, humanized antibodies are humanimmunoglobulins (recipient antibody) in which residues from ahypervariable region of the recipient are replaced by residues from ahypervariable region of a non-human species (donor antibody) such asmouse, rat, rabbit or nonhuman primate having the desired specificity,affinity, and capacity. In some instances, framework region (FR)residues of the human immunoglobulin are replaced by correspondingnon-human residues. Furthermore, humanized antibodies may compriseresidues that are not found in the recipient antibody or in the donorantibody. These modifications are made to further refine antibodyperformance. In general, the humanized antibody will comprisesubstantially all of at least one, and typically two, variable domains,in which all or substantially all of the hypervariable loops correspondto those of a non-human immunoglobulin and all or substantially all ofthe FRs are those of a human immunoglobulin sequence. The humanizedantibody optionally will also comprise at least a portion of animmunoglobulin constant region (Fc), typically that of a humanimmunoglobulin. For further details, see Jones et al., Nature321:522-525 (1986); Riechmann et al., Nature 332:323-329 (1988); andPresta, Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 2:593-596 (1992). See also the followingreview articles and references cited therein: Vaswani and Hamilton, Ann.Allergy, Asthma & Immunol. 1:105-115 (1998); Harris, Biochem. Soc.Transactions 23:1035-1038 (1995); Hurle and Gross, Curr. Op. Biotech.5:428-433 (1994).

A “human antibody” is one which possesses an amino acid sequence whichcorresponds to that of an antibody produced by a human and/or has beenmade using any of the techniques for making human antibodies asdisclosed herein. This definition of a human antibody specificallyexcludes a humanized antibody comprising non-human antigen-bindingresidues.

An “affinity matured” antibody is one with one or more alterations inone or more CDRs thereof which result in an improvement in the affinityof the antibody for antigen, compared to a parent antibody which doesnot possess those alteration(s). Preferred affinity matured antibodieswill have nanomolar or even picomolar affinities for the target antigen.Affinity matured antibodies are produced by procedures known in the art.Marks et al. Bio/Technology 10:779-783 (1992) describes affinitymaturation by VH and VL domain shuffling. Random mutagenesis of CDRand/or framework residues is described by: Barbas et al. Proc Nat. Acad.Sci, USA 91:3809-3813 (1994); Schier et al. Gene 169:147-155 (1995);Yelton et al. J. Immunol. 155:1994-2004 (1995); Jackson et al., J.Immunol. 154(7):3310-9 (1995); and Hawkins et al, J. Mol. Biol.226:889-896 (1992).

A “blocking” antibody or an “antagonist” antibody is one which inhibitsor reduces biological activity of the antigen it binds. Preferredblocking antibodies or antagonist antibodies substantially or completelyinhibit the biological activity of the antigen.

An “agonist antibody”, as used herein, is an antibody which mimics atleast one of the functional activities of a polypeptide of interest.

A “disorder” or “pathological condition” is any condition that wouldbenefit from treatment with a substance/molecule or method of theinvention. This includes chronic and acute disorders or diseasesincluding those pathological conditions which predispose the mammal tothe disorder in question. Non-limiting examples of disorders to betreated herein include malignant and benign tumors or cancers;non-leukemias and lymphoid malignancies; neuronal, glial, astrocytal,hypothalamic and other glandular, macrophagal, epithelial, stromal andblastocoelic disorders; and inflammatory, immunologic, neurodegenerativedisorders, angiogenesis-related disorders and disorders related tomitochondrial or metabolic defects.

The terms “cell proliferative disorder” and “proliferative disorder”refer to disorders that are associated with some degree of abnormal cellproliferation. In one embodiment, the cell proliferative disorder iscancer.

“Tumor”, as used herein, refers to all neoplastic cell growth andproliferation, whether malignant or benign, and all pre-cancerous andcancerous cells and tissues. The terms “cancer”, “cancerous”, “cellproliferative disorder”, “proliferative disorder” and “tumor” are notmutually exclusive as referred to herein.

The terms “cancer” and “cancerous” refer to or describe thephysiological condition in mammals that is typically characterized byunregulated cell growth/proliferation. Examples of cancer include butare not limited to, carcinoma, lymphoma, blastoma, sarcoma, andleukemia. More particular examples of such cancers include multiplemyeloma, squamous cell cancer, small-cell lung cancer, non-small celllung cancer, adenocarcinoma of the lung, squamous carcinoma of the lung,cancer of the peritoneum, hepatocellular cancer, gastrointestinalcancer, pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, cervical cancer, ovariancancer, liver cancer, bladder cancer, hepatoma, breast cancer, coloncancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial or uterine carcinoma, salivarygland carcinoma, kidney cancer (e.g., renal cell carcinoma), livercancer, prostate cancer, vulval cancer, thyroid cancer, hepaticcarcinoma and various types of head and neck cancer.

As used herein, “treatment” refers to clinical intervention in anattempt to alter the natural course of the individual or cell beingtreated, and can be performed either for prophylaxis or during thecourse of clinical pathology. Desirable effects of treatment includepreventing occurrence or recurrence of disease, alleviation of symptoms,diminishment of any direct or indirect pathological consequences of thedisease, preventing metastasis, decreasing the rate of diseaseprogression, amelioration or palliation of the disease state, andremission or improved prognosis. In some embodiments, antibodies of theinvention are used to delay development of a disease or disorder.

An “effective amount” refers to an amount effective, at dosages and forperiods of time necessary, to achieve the desired therapeutic orprophylactic result.

A “therapeutically effective amount” of a substance/molecule of theinvention, agonist or antagonist may vary according to factors such asthe disease state, age, sex, and weight of the individual, and theability of the substance/molecule, agonist or antagonist to elicit adesired response in the individual. A therapeutically effective amountis also one in which any toxic or detrimental effects of thesubstance/molecule, agonist or antagonist are outweighed by thetherapeutically beneficial effects. A “prophylactically effectiveamount” refers to an amount effective, at dosages and for periods oftime necessary, to achieve the desired prophylactic result. Typicallybut not necessarily, since a prophylactic dose is used in subjects priorto or at an earlier stage of disease, the prophylactically effectiveamount will be less than the therapeutically effective amount.

The term “cytotoxic agent” as used herein refers to a substance thatinhibits or prevents the function of cells and/or causes destruction ofcells. The term is intended to include radioactive isotopes (e.g.,At²¹¹, I¹³¹, I¹²⁵, Y⁹⁰, Re¹⁸⁶, Re¹⁸⁸, SM¹⁵³, Bi²¹², P³² and radioactiveisotopes of Lu), chemotherapeutic agents e.g. methotrexate, adriamicin,vinca alkaloids (vincristine, vinblastine, etoposide), doxorubicin,melphalan, mitomycin C, chlorambucil, daunorubicin or otherintercalating agents, enzymes and fragments thereof such as nucleolyticenzymes, antibiotics, and toxins such as small molecule toxins orenzymatically active toxins of bacterial, fungal, plant or animalorigin, including fragments and/or variants thereof, and the variousantitumor or anticancer agents disclosed below. Other cytotoxic agentsare described below. A tumoricidal agent causes destruction of tumorcells.

A “chemotherapeutic agent” is a chemical compound useful in thetreatment of cancer. Examples of chemotherapeutic agents includealkylating agents such as thiotepa and CYTOXAN® cyclosphosphamide; alkylsulfonates such as busulfan, improsulfan and piposulfan; aziridines suchas benzodopa, carboquone, meturedopa, and uredopa; ethylenimines andmethylamelamines including altretamine, triethylenemelamine,trietylenephosphoramide, triethiylenethiophosphoramide andtrimethylolomelamine; acetogenins (especially bullatacin andbullatacinone); a camptothecin (including the synthetic analoguetopotecan); bryostatin; callystatin; CC-1065 (including its adozelesin,carzelesin and bizelesin synthetic analogues); cryptophycins(particularly cryptophycin 1 and cryptophycin 8); dolastatin;duocarmycin (including the synthetic analogues, KW-2189 and CB1-TM1);eleutherobin; pancratistatin; a sarcodictyin; spongistatin; nitrogenmustards such as chlorambucil, chlornaphazine, cholophosphamide,estramustine, ifosfamide, mechlorethamine, mechlorethamine oxidehydrochloride, melphalan, novembichin, phenesterine, prednimustine,trofosfamide, uracil mustard; nitrosureas such as carmustine,chlorozotocin, fotemustine, lomustine, nimustine, and ranimnustine;antibiotics such as the enediyne antibiotics (e. g., calicheamicin,especially calicheamicin gamma1I and calicheamicin omegaI1 (see, e.g.,Agnew, Chem Intl. Ed. Engl., 33: 183-186 (1994)); dynemicin, includingdynemicin A; bisphosphonates, such as clodronate; an esperamicin; aswell as neocarzinostatin chromophore and related chromoprotein enediyneantiobiotic chromophores), aclacinomysins, actinomycin, authramycin,azaserine, bleomycins, cactinomycin, carabicin, carminomycin,carzinophilin, chromomycinis, dactinomycin, daunorubicin, detorubicin,6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine, ADRIAMYCIN® doxorubicin (includingmorpholino-doxorubicin, cyanomorpholino-doxorubicin,2-pyrrolino-doxorubicin and deoxydoxorubicin), epirubicin, esorubicin,idarubicin, marcellomycin, mitomycins such as mitomycin C, mycophenolicacid, nogalamycin, olivomycins, peplomycin, potfiromycin, puromycin,quelamycin, rodorubicin, streptonigrin, streptozocin, tubercidin,ubenimex, zinostatin, zorubicin; anti-metabolites such as methotrexateand 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); folic acid analogues such as denopterin,methotrexate, pteropterin, trimetrexate; purine analogs such asfludarabine, 6-mercaptopurine, thiamiprine, thioguanine; pyrimidineanalogs such as ancitabine, azacitidine, 6-azauridine, carmofur,cytarabine, dideoxyuridine, doxifluridine, enocitabine, floxuridine;androgens such as calusterone, dromostanolone propionate, epitiostanol,mepitiostane, testolactone; anti- adrenals such as aminoglutethimide,mitotane, trilostane; folic acid replenisher such as frolinic acid;aceglatone; aldophosphamide glycoside; aminolevulinic acid; eniluracil;amsacrine; bestrabucil; bisantrene; edatraxate; defofamine; demecolcine;diaziquone; elfornithine; elliptinium acetate; an epothilone; etoglucid;gallium nitrate; hydroxyurea; lentinan; lonidainine; maytansinoids suchas maytansine and ansamitocins; mitoguazone; mitoxantrone; mopidanmol;nitraerine; pentostatin; phenamet; pirarubicin; losoxantrone;podophyllinic acid; 2-ethylhydrazide; procarbazine; PSK® polysaccharidecomplex (JHS Natural Products, Eugene, OR); razoxane; rhizoxin;sizofiran; spirogermanium; tenuazonic acid; triaziquone;2,2′,2″-trichlorotriethylamine; trichothecenes (especially T-2 toxin,verracurin A, roridin A and anguidine); urethan; vindesine; dacarbazine;mannomustine; mitobronitol; mitolactol; pipobroman; gacytosine;arabinoside (“Ara-C”); cyclophosphamide; thiotepa; taxoids, e.g., TAXOL®paclitaxel (Bristol- Myers Squibb Oncology, Princeton, N.J.), ABRAXANE™Cremophor-free, albumin-engineered nanoparticle formulation ofpaclitaxel (American Pharmaceutical Partners, Schaumberg, Ill.), andTAXOTERE® doxetaxel (Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France); chloranbucil;GEMZAR® gemcitabine; 6- thioguanine; mercaptopurine; methotrexate;platinum analogs such as cisplatin and carboplatin; vinblastine;platinum; etoposide (VP-16); ifosfamide; mitoxantrone; vincristine;NAVELBINEO vinorelbine; novantrone; teniposide; edatrexate; daunomycin;aminopterin; xeloda; ibandronate; CPT-11; topoisomerase inhibitor RFS2000; difluorometlhylornithine (DMFO); retinoids such as retinoic acid;capecitabine; and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, acids orderivatives of any of the above.

Also included in the definition of “chemotherapeutic agent” above areanti-hormonal agents that act to regulate or inhibit hormone action ontumors such as anti-estrogens and selective estrogen receptor modulators(SERMs), including, for example, tamoxifen (including NOLVADEX®tamoxifen), raloxifene, droloxifene, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, trioxifene,keoxifene, LY117018, onapristone, and FARESTON·toremifene; aromataseinhibitors that inhibit the enzyme aromatase, which regulates estrogenproduction in the adrenal glands, such as, for example, 4(5)-imidazoles,aminoglutethimide, MEGASE® megestrol acetate, AROMASIN® exemestane,formestanie, fadrozole, RIVISOR® vorozole, FEMARA® letrozole, andARIMIDEX® anastrozole; and anti-androgens such as flutamide, nilutamide,bicalutamide, leuprolide, and goserelin; as well as troxacitabine (a1,3-dioxolane nucleoside cytosine analog); antisense oligonucleotides,particularly those which inhibit expression of genes in signalingpathways implicated in abherant cell proliferation, such as, forexample, PKC-alpha, Ralf and H-Ras; ribozymes such as a VEGF expressioninhibitor (e.g., ANGIOZYME® ribozyme) and a HER2 expression inhibitor;vaccines such as gene therapy vaccines, for example, ALLOVECTIN®vaccine, LEUVECTIN® vaccine, and VAXID® vaccine; PROLEUKIN® rIL-2;LURTOTECAN® topoisomerase 1 inhibitor; ABARELIX® rmRH; andpharmaceutically acceptable salts, acids or derivatives of any of theabove.

A “growth inhibitory agent” when used herein refers to a compound orcomposition which inhibits growth of a cell whose growth is dependentupon HGF/c-met activation either in vitro or in vivo. Thus, the growthinhibitory agent may be one which significantly reduces the percentageof HGF/c-met-dependent cells in S phase. Examples of growth inhibitoryagents include agents that block cell cycle progression (at a placeother than S phase), such as agents that induce G1 arrest and M-phasearrest. Classical M-phase blockers include the vincas (vincristine andvinblastine), taxanes, and topoisomerase II inhibitors such asdoxorubicin, epirubicin, daunorubicin, etoposide, and bleomycin. Thoseagents that arrest G1 also spill over into S-phase arrest, for example,DNA alkylating agents such as tamoxifen, prednisone, dacarbazine,mechlorethamine, cisplatin, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and ara-C.Further information can be found in The Molecular Basis of Cancer,Mendelsohn and Israel, eds., Chapter 1, entitled “Cell cycle regulation,oncogenes, and antineoplastic drugs” by Murakami et al. (W B Saunders:Philadelphia, 1995), especially p. 13. The taxanes (paclitaxel anddocetaxel) are anticancer drugs both derived from the yew tree.Docetaxel (TAXOTERE®, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer), derived from the Europeanyew, is a semisynthetic analogue of paclitaxel (TAXOL®, Bristol-MyersSquibb). Paclitaxel and docetaxel promote the assembly of microtubulesfrom tubulin dimers and stabilize microtubules by preventingdepolymerization, which results in the inhibition of mitosis in cells.

“Doxorubicin” is an anthracycline antibiotic. The full chemical name ofdoxorubicin is(8S-cis)-10-[(3-amino-2,3,6-trideoxy-α-L-lyxo-hexapyranosyl)oxy]-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-6,8,11-trihydroxy-8-(hydroxyacetyl)-1-methoxy-5,12-naphthacenedione.

HGF/Met Antagonists—Peptides/Polypeptides (Including Antibodies)

One aspect of the invention pertains to isolated peptide/polypeptide andantibody modulators of HGF β chain-β chain interaction and HGF-Metinteraction. In one embodiment, modulators (such aspeptides/polypeptides and antibodies) can be isolated from cells ortissue sources by an appropriate purification scheme using standardprotein purification techniques. In another embodiment, the modulatorsare produced by recombinant DNA techniques. As an alternative torecombinant expression, modulators can be synthesized chemically usingstandard peptide synthesis techniques.

HGF/Met antagonist molecules of the invention include those described inFIG. 1. The invention also provides a mutant or variant protein any ofwhich residues may be changed from the corresponding residues of thesepeptides/polypeptides, while still encoding a peptide/polypeptide thatmaintains modulatory activity. In one embodiment, a variant of apeptide/polypeptide antagonist has at least 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%,95%, 98%, 99% amino acid sequence identity with the sequence of areference peptide/polypeptide antagonist. In general, the variantexhibits substantially the same or greater binding affinity than thereference binder peptide/polypeptide antagonist, e.g., at least 0.75×,0.8×, 0.9×, 1.0×, 1.25× or 1.5× the binding affinity of the referencebinder peptide/polypeptide/ligand, based on an art-accepted bindingassay quantitation unit/metric, while retaining a desirable degree ofantagonist activity.

In general, variants of the invention include variants in which residuesat a particular position in the sequence have been substituted by otheramino acids, and further includes the possibility of inserting anadditional residue or residues between two residues of the parentprotein/peptide as well as the possibility of deleting one or moreresidues from the parent sequence or adding one or more residues to theparent sequence. Any amino acid substitution, insertion, or deletion isencompassed by the invention. In favorable circumstances, thesubstitution is a conservative substitution as described herein.

An “isolated” or “purified” peptide, polypeptide, protein orbiologically active fragment is separated and/or recovered from acomponent of its natural environment. Contaminant components includematerials that would typically interfere with diagnostic or therapeuticuses for the polypeptide, and may include enzymes, hormones, and otherproteinaceous or non-proteinaceous materials. Preparations havingpreferably less than 30% by dry weight of non-desired contaminatingmaterial (contaminants), preferably less than 20%, 10%, and preferablyless than 5% contaminants are considered to be substantially isolated.An isolated, recombinantly-produced peptide/polypeptide or biologicallyactive portion thereof is preferably substantially free of culturemedium, i.e., culture medium represents preferably less than 20%,preferably less than about 10%, and preferably less than about 5% of thevolume of a peptide/polypeptide preparation. Examples of contaminantsinclude cell debris, culture media, and substances used and producedduring in vitro synthesis of the peptide/polypeptide.

Conservative substitutions of peptides/polypeptides are shown in Table Aunder the heading of “preferred substitutions”. If such substitutionsresult in a change in biological activity, then more substantialchanges, denominated “exemplary substitutions” in Table A, or as furtherdescribed below in reference to amino acid classes, may be introducedand the products screened.

TABLE A Original Exemplary Preferred Residue Substitutions SubstitutionsAla (A) val; leu; ile val Arg (R) lys; gln; asn lys Asn (N) gln; his;asp, lys; arg gln Asp (D) glu; asn glu Cys (C) ser; ala ser Gln (Q) asn;glu asn Glu (E) asp; gln asp Gly (G) ala ala His (H) asn; gln; lys; argarg Ile (I) leu; val; met; ala; phe; norleucine leu Leu (L) norleucine;ile; val; met; ala; phe ile Lys (K) arg; gln; asn arg Met (M) leu; phe;ile leu Phe (F) leu; val; ile; ala; tyr tyr Pro (P) ala ala Ser (S) thr;cys cys Thr (T) ser ser Trp (W) tyr; phe tyr Tyr (Y) trp; phe; thr; serphe Val (V) ile; leu; met; phe; ala; norleucine leu

Substantial modifications in the biological properties of thepeptide/polypeptide are accomplished by selecting substitutions thatdiffer significantly in their effect on maintaining (a) the structure ofthe polypeptide backbone in the area of the substitution, for example,as a sheet or helical conformation, (b) the charge or hydrophobicity ofthe molecule at the target site, or (c) the bulk of the side chain.Naturally occurring residues are divided into groups based on commonside-chain properties:

-   -   (1) hydrophobic: norleucine, met, ala, val, leu, ile;    -   (2) neutral hydrophilic: cys, ser, thr;    -   (3) acidic: asp, glu;    -   (4) basic: asn, gln, his, lys, arg;    -   (5) residues that influence chain orientation: gly, pro; and    -   (6) aromatic: trp, tyr, phe.    -   Non-conservative substitutions will entail exchanging a member        of one of these classes for another class.

Variants of antibody modulators can also be made based on informationknown in the art, without substantially affecting the activity ofantibody. For example, antibody variants can have at least one aminoacid residue in the antibody molecule replaced by a different residue.For antibodies, the sites of greatest interest for substitutionalmutagenesis generally include the hypervariable regions, but frameworkregion (FR) alterations are also contemplated.

For antibodies, one type of substitutional variant involves substitutingone or more hypervariable region residues of a parent antibody (e.g. ahumanized or human antibody). Generally, the resulting variant(s)selected for further development will have improved biologicalproperties relative to the parent antibody from which they aregenerated. A convenient way for generating such substitutional variantsinvolves affinity maturation using phage display. Briefly, severalhypervariable region sites (e.g. 6-7 sites) are mutated to generate allpossible amino acid substitutions at each site. The antibodies thusgenerated are displayed from filamentous phage particles as fusions tothe gene III product of M13 packaged within each particle. Thephage-displayed variants are then screened for their biological activity(e.g. binding affinity) as herein disclosed. In order to identifycandidate hypervariable region sites for modification, alanine scanningmutagenesis can be performed to identify hypervariable region residuescontributing significantly to antigen binding. Alternatively, oradditionally, it may be beneficial to analyze a crystal structure of theantigen-antibody complex to identify contact points between the antibodyand antigen. Such contact residues and neighboring residues arecandidates for substitution according to the techniques elaboratedherein. Once such variants are generated, the panel of variants issubjected to screening as described herein and antibodies with superiorproperties in one or more relevant assays may be selected for furtherdevelopment.

Nucleic acid molecules encoding amino acid sequence variants of theantibody are prepared by a variety of methods known in the art. Thesemethods include, but are not limited to, isolation from a natural source(in the case of naturally occurring amino acid sequence variants) orpreparation by oligonucleotide-mediated (or site-directed) mutagenesis,PCR mutagenesis, and cassette mutagenesis of an earlier prepared variantor a non-variant version of the antibody.

It may be desirable to introduce one or more amino acid modifications inan Fc region of the immunoglobulin polypeptides of the invention,thereby generating a Fc region variant. The Fc region variant maycomprise a human Fc region sequence (e.g., a human IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 orIgG4 Fc region) comprising an amino acid modification (e.g. asubstitution) at one or more amino acid positions including that of ahinge cysteine.

In one embodiment, the Fc region variant may display altered neonatal Fcreceptor (FcRn) binding affinity. Such variant Fc regions may comprisean amino acid modification at any one or more of amino acid positions238, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 265, 272, 286, 288, 303, 305, 307, 309,311, 312, 317, 340, 356, 360, 362, 376, 378, 380, 382, 386, 388, 400,413, 415, 424, 433, 434, 435, 436, 439 or 447 of the Fc region, whereinthe numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of the EU indexas in Kabat. Fc region variants with reduced binding to an FcRn maycomprise an amino acid modification at any one or more of amino acidpositions 252, 253, 254, 255, 288, 309, 386, 388, 400, 415, 433, 435,436, 439 or 447 of the Fc region, wherein the numbering of the residuesin the Fc region is that of the EU index as in Kabat. Theabove-mentioned Fc region variants may, alternatively, display increasedbinding to FcRn and comprise an amino acid modification at any one ormore of amino acid positions 238, 256, 265, 272, 286, 303, 305, 307,311, 312, 317, 340, 356, 360, 362, 376, 378, 380, 382, 413, 424 or 434of the Fc region, wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc regionis that of the EU index as in Kabat.

The Fc region variant with reduced binding to an FcγR may comprise anamino acid modification at any one or more of amino acid positions 238,239, 248, 249, 252, 254, 265, 268, 269, 270, 272, 278, 289, 292, 293,294, 295, 296, 298, 301, 303, 322, 324, 327, 329, 333, 335, 338, 340,373, 376, 382, 388, 389, 414, 416, 419, 434, 435, 437, 438 or 439 of theFc region, wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc region isthat of the EU index as in Kabat.

For example, the Fc region variant may display reduced binding to anFcγRI and comprise an amino acid modification at any one or more ofamino acid positions 238, 265, 269, 270, 327 or 329 of the Fc region,wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of the EUindex as in Kabat.

The Fc region variant may display reduced binding to an FcγRII andcomprise an amino acid modification at any one or more of amino acidpositions 238, 265, 269, 270, 292, 294, 295, 298, 303, 324, 327, 329,333, 335, 338, 373, 376, 414, 416, 419, 435, 438 or 439 of the Fcregion, wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc region is thatof the EU index as in Kabat.

The Fc region variant of interest may display reduced binding to anFcγRIII and comprise an amino acid modification at one or more of aminoacid positions 238, 239, 248, 249, 252, 254, 265, 268, 269, 270, 272,278, 289, 293, 294, 295, 296, 301, 303, 322, 327, 329, 338, 340, 373,376, 382, 388, 389, 416, 434, 435 or 437 of the Fc region, wherein thenumbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index as inKabat.

Fc region variants with altered (i.e. improved or diminished) Clqbinding and/or Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC) are described inWO99/51642. Such variants may comprise an amino acid substitution at oneor more of amino acid positions 270, 322, 326, 327, 329, 331, 333 or 334of the Fc region. See, also, Duncan & Winter Nature 322:738-40 (1988);U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,648,260; 5,624,821; and WO94/29351 concerning Fc regionvariants.

Vector Construction

Polynucleotide sequences encoding the peptides/polypeptides describedherein can be obtained using standard recombinant techniques. Desiredpolynucleotide sequences may be isolated and sequenced from appropriatesource cells. Source cells for antibodies would include antibodyproducing cells such as hybridoma cells. Alternatively, polynucleotidescan be synthesized using nucleotide synthesizer or PCR techniques. Onceobtained, sequences encoding the immunoglobulins are inserted into arecombinant vector capable of replicating and expressing heterologouspolynucleotides in a host cell. Many vectors that are available andknown in the art can be used for the purpose of the present invention.Selection of an appropriate vector will depend mainly on the size of thenucleic acids to be inserted into the vector and the particular hostcell to be transformed with the vector. Each vector contains variouscomponents, depending on its function (amplification or expression ofheterologous polynucleotide, or both) and its compatibility with theparticular host cell in which it resides. The vector componentsgenerally include, but are not limited to: an origin of replication (inparticular when the vector is inserted into a prokaryotic cell), aselection marker gene, a promoter, a ribosome binding site (RBS), asignal sequence, the heterologous nucleic acid insert and atranscription termination sequence.

In general, plasmid vectors containing replicon and control sequenceswhich are derived from a species compatible with the host cell are usedin connection with these hosts. The vector ordinarily carries areplication site, as well as marking sequences which are capable ofproviding phenotypic selection in transformed cells. For example, E.coli is typically transformed using pBR322, a plasmid derived from an E.coli species. pBR322 contains genes encoding ampicillin (Amp) andtetracycline (Tet) resistance and thus provides easy means foridentifying transformed cells. pBR322, its derivatives, or othermicrobial plasmids or bacteriophage may also contain, or be modified tocontain, promoters which can be used by the microbial organism forexpression of endogenous proteins.

In addition, phage vectors containing replicon and control sequencesthat are compatible with the host microorganism can be used astransforming vectors in connection with these hosts. For example,bacteriophage such as λGEM.TM.-11 may be utilized in making arecombinant vector which can be used to transform susceptible host cellssuch as E. coli LE392.

Either constitutive or inducible promoters can be used in the presentinvention, in accordance with the needs of a particular situation, whichcan be ascertained by one skilled in the art. A large number ofpromoters recognized by a variety of potential host cells are wellknown. The selected promoter can be operably linked to cistron DNAencoding a polypeptide described herein by removing the promoter fromthe source DNA via restriction enzyme digestion and inserting theisolated promoter sequence into the vector of choice. Both the nativepromoter sequence and many heterologous promoters may be used to directamplification and/or expression of the target genes. However,heterologous promoters are preferred, as they generally permit greatertranscription and higher yields of expressed target gene as compared tothe native target polypeptide promoter.

Promoters suitable for use with prokaryotic hosts include the PhoApromoter, the β-galactamase and lactose promoter systems, a tryptophan(trp) promoter system and hybrid promoters such as the tac or the trcpromoter. However, other promoters that are functional in bacteria (suchas other known bacterial or phage promoters) are suitable as well. Theirnucleotide sequences have been published, thereby enabling a skilledworker operably to ligate them to cistrons encoding the target light andheavy chains (Siebenlist et al. (1980) Cell 20: 269) using linkers oradaptors to supply any required restriction sites.

In some embodiments, each cistron within a recombinant vector comprisesa secretion signal sequence component that directs translocation of theexpressed polypeptides across a membrane. In general, the signalsequence may be a component of the vector, or it may be a part of thetarget polypeptide DNA that is inserted into the vector. The signalsequence selected for the purpose of this invention should be one thatis recognized and processed (i.e. cleaved by a signal peptidase) by thehost cell. For prokaryotic host cells that do not recognize and processthe signal sequences native to the heterologous polypeptides, the signalsequence is substituted by a prokaryotic signal sequence selected, forexample, from the group consisting of the alkaline phosphatase,penicillinase, Ipp, or heat-stable enterotoxin II (STII) leaders, LamB,PhoE, PelB, OmpA and MBP.

Prokaryotic host cells suitable for expressing polypeptides includeArchaebacteria and Eubacteria, such as Gram-negative or Gram-positiveorganisms. Examples of useful bacteria include Escherichia (e.g., E.coli), Bacilli (e.g., B. subtilis), Enterobacteria, Pseudomonas species(e.g., P. aeruginosa), Salmonella typhimurium, Serratia marcescans,Klebsiella, Proteus, Shigella, Rhizobia, Vitreoscilla, or Paracoccus.Preferably, gram-negative cells are used. Preferably the host cellshould secrete minimal amounts of proteolytic enzymes, and additionalprotease inhibitors may desirably be incorporated in the cell culture.

Peptide/Polypeptide Production

Host cells are transformed or transfected with the above-describedexpression vectors and cultured in conventional nutrient media modifiedas appropriate for inducing promoters, selecting transformants, oramplifying the genes encoding the desired sequences.

Transfection refers to the taking up of an expression vector by a hostcell whether or not any coding sequences are in fact expressed. Numerousmethods of transfection are known to the ordinarily skilled artisan, forexample, CaPO₄ precipitation and electroporation. Successfultransfection is generally recognized when any indication of theoperation of this vector occurs within the host cell.

Transformation means introducing DNA into the prokaryotic host so thatthe DNA is replicable, either as an extrachromosomal element or bychromosomal integrant. Depending on the host cell used, transformationis done using standard techniques appropriate to such cells. The calciumtreatment employing calcium chloride is generally used for bacterialcells that contain substantial cell-wall barriers. Another method fortransformation employs polyethylene glycol/DMSO. Yet another techniqueused is electroporation.

Prokaryotic cells used to produce the peptides/polypeptides of theinvention are grown in media known in the art and suitable for cultureof the selected host cells. Examples of suitable media include luriabroth (LB) plus necessary nutrient supplements. In preferredembodiments, the media also contains a selection agent, chosen based onthe construction of the expression vector, to selectively permit growthof prokaryotic cells containing the expression vector. For example,ampicillin is added to media for growth of cells expressing ampicillinresistant gene.

Any necessary supplements besides carbon, nitrogen, and inorganicphosphate sources may also be included at appropriate concentrationsintroduced alone or as a mixture with another supplement or medium suchas a complex nitrogen source. Optionally the culture medium may containone or more reducing agents selected from the group consisting ofglutathione, cysteine, cystamine, thioglycollate, dithioerythritol anddithiothreitol.

The prokaryotic host cells are cultured at suitable temperatures. For E.coli growth, for example, the preferred temperature ranges from about20° C. to about 39° C., more preferably from about 25° C. to about 37°C., even more preferably at about 30° C. The pH of the medium may be anypH ranging from about 5 to about 9, depending mainly on the hostorganism. For E. coli, the pH is preferably from about 6.8 to about 7.4,and more preferably about 7.0.

If an inducible promoter is used in the expression vector, proteinexpression is induced under conditions suitable for the activation ofthe promoter. For example, if a PhoA promoter is used for controllingtranscription, the transformed host cells may be cultured in aphosphate-limiting medium for induction. A variety of other inducers maybe used, according to the vector construct employed, as is known in theart.

Peptide/polypeptides described herein expressed in a microorganism maybe secreted into and recovered from the periplasm of the host cells.Protein recovery typically involves disrupting the microorganism,generally by such means as osmotic shock, sonication or lysis. Oncecells are disrupted, cell debris or whole cells may be removed bycentrifugation or filtration. The proteins may be further purified, forexample, by affinity resin chromatography. Alternatively, proteins canbe transported into the culture media and isolated therefrom. Cells maybe removed from the culture and the culture supernatant being filteredand concentrated for further purification of the proteins produced. Theexpressed polypeptides can be further isolated and identified usingcommonly known methods such as fractionation on immunoaffinity orion-exchange columns; ethanol precipitation; reverse phase HPLC;chromatography on silica or on a cation exchange resin such as DEAE;chromatofocusing; SDS-PAGE; ammonium sulfate precipitation; gelfiltration using, for example, Sephadex G-75; hydrophobic affinityresins, ligand affinity using a suitable antigen immobilized on a matrixand Western blot assay.

Besides prokaryotic host cells, eukaryotic host cell systems are alsowell established in the art. Suitable hosts include mammalian cell linessuch as CHO, and insect cells such as those described below.

Peptide/Polypeptide Purification

Peptides/polypeptides that are produced may be purified to obtainpreparations that are substantially homogeneous for further assays anduses. Standard protein purification methods known in the art can beemployed. The following procedures are exemplary of suitablepurification procedures: fractionation on immunoaffinity or ion-exchangecolumns, ethanol precipitation, reverse phase HPLC, chromatography onsilica or on a cation-exchange resin such as DEAE, chromatofocusing,SDS-PAGE, ammonium sulfate precipitation, and gel filtration using, forexample, Sephadex G-75.

Methods of the Invention

The invention provides various methods based on the finding thatmutations in certain regions of the HGF β chain result in modificationof the biological activities of the molecule, whereby such mutantmolecules exhibit antagonistic effects in the modulation of the HGF/Metpathway.

Various substances or molecules (including peptides/polypeptides, etc.)may be employed as therapeutic agents in accordance with the methods ofthe invention. These substances or molecules can be formulated accordingto known methods to prepare pharmaceutically useful compositions,whereby the product hereof is combined in admixture with apharmaceutically acceptable carrier vehicle. Therapeutic formulationsare prepared for storage by mixing the active ingredient having thedesired degree of purity with optional physiologically acceptablecarriers, excipients or stabilizers (Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences16th edition, Osol, A. Ed. (1980)), in the form of lyophilizedformulations or aqueous solutions. Acceptable carriers, excipients orstabilizers are nontoxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrationsemployed, and include buffers such as phosphate, citrate and otherorganic acids; antioxidants including ascorbic acid; low molecularweight (less than about 10 residues) polypeptides; proteins, such asserum albumin, gelatin or immunoglobulins; hydrophilic polymers such aspolyvinylpyrrolidone, amino acids such as glycine, glutamine,asparagine, arginine or lysine; monosaccharides, disaccharides and othercarbohydrates including glucose, mannose, or dextrins; chelating agentssuch as EDTA; sugar alcohols such as mannitol or sorbitol; salt-formingcounterions such as sodium; and/or nonionic surfactants such as TWEEN™,PLURONICS™ or PEG.

The formulations to be used for in vivo administration must be sterile.This is readily accomplished by filtration through sterile filtrationmembranes, prior to or following lyophilization and reconstitution.

Therapeutic compositions herein generally are placed into a containerhaving a sterile access port, for example, an intravenous solution bagor vial having a stopper pierceable by a hypodermic injection needle.

The route of administration is in accord with known methods, e.g.injection or infusion by intravenous, intraperitoneal, intracerebral,intramuscular, intraocular, intraarterial or intralesional routes,topical administration, or by sustained release systems.

Dosages and desired drug concentrations of pharmaceutical compositionsof the present invention may vary depending on the particular useenvisioned. The determination of the appropriate dosage or route ofadministration is well within the skill of an ordinary physician. Animalexperiments provide reliable guidance for the determination of effectivedoses for human therapy. Interspecies scaling of effective doses can beperformed following the principles laid down by Mordenti, J. andChappell, W. “The use of interspecies scaling in toxicokinetics” InToxicokinetics and New Drug Development, Yacobi et al., Eds., PergamonPress, New York 1989, pp. 42-96.

When in vivo administration of a substance or molecule of the inventionis employed, normal dosage amounts may vary from about 10 ng/kg to up to100 mg/kg of mammal body weight or more per day, preferably about 1μg/kg/day to 10 mg/kg/day, depending upon the route of administration.Guidance as to particular dosages and methods of delivery is provided inthe literature; see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,657,760; 5,206,344;or 5,225,212. It is anticipated that different formulations will beeffective for different treatment compounds and different disorders,that administration targeting one organ or tissue, for example, maynecessitate delivery in a manner different from that to another organ ortissue.

Where sustained-release administration of a substance or molecule isdesired in a formulation with release characteristics suitable for thetreatment of any disease or disorder requiring administration of thesubstance or molecule, microencapsulation of the substance or moleculeis contemplated. Microencapsulation of recombinant proteins forsustained release has been successfully performed with human growthhormone (rhGH), interferon-(rhIFN-), interleukin-2, and MN rgp120.Johnson et al., Nat. Med., 2:795-799 (1996); Yasuda, Biomed. Ther.,27:1221-1223 (1993); Hora et al., Bio/Technology, 8:755-758 (1990);Cleland, “Design and Production of Single Immunization Vaccines UsingPolylactide Polyglycolide Microsphere Systems,” in Vaccine Design: TheSubunit and Adjuvant Approach, Powell and Newman, eds, (Plenum Press:New York, 1995), pp. 439-462; WO 97/03692, WO 96/40072, WO 96/07399; andU.S. Pat. No. 5,654,010.

The sustained-release formulations of these proteins were developedusing poly-lactic-coglycolic acid (PLGA) polymer due to itsbiocompatibility and wide range of biodegradable properties. Thedegradation products of PLGA, lactic and glycolic acids, can be clearedquickly within the human body. Moreover, the degradability of thispolymer can be adjusted from months to years depending on its molecularweight and composition. Lewis, “Controlled release of bioactive agentsfrom lactide/glycolide polymer,” in: M. Chasin and R. Langer (Eds.),Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems (Marcel Dekker: NewYork, 1990), pp. 1-41.

The identification of regions within the HGF β chain that are criticalfor HGF function in the HGF/Met signaling pathway provides sites withinHGF β chain against which antagonists can be targeted. Examples ofpotential antagonists include an oligonucleotide (which may be anaptamer) that binds to N-terminal and/or dimerization regions of HGF βchain, and, in particular, antibodies including, without limitation,poly- and monoclonal antibodies and antibody fragments, single-chainantibodies, anti-idiotypic antibodies, and chimeric or humanizedversions of such antibodies or fragments, as well as human antibodiesand antibody fragments. Aptamers are nucleic acid molecules that arecapable of binding to a target molecule. The generation and therapeuticuse of aptamers are well established in the art. See, e.g., U.S. Pat.No. 5,475,096, and the therapeutic efficacy of Macugen® (Eyetech, NewYork) for treating age-related macular degeneration.

As described herein, an HGF/Met antagonist substance/molecule of theinvention can be a peptide or polypeptide (including an antibody).Methods of obtaining such peptides and polypeptides are well known inthe art, and include screening peptide and polypeptide libraries forbinders to a suitable target antigen. In one embodiment, suitable targetantigens would comprise HGF β chain (or portion thereof that comprisesthe N-terminal and/or dimerization region), which is described in detailherein. In one embodiment, suitable target antigens would comprise Met,for example the extracellular domain of Met. Libraries of peptides andpolypeptides are well known in the art, and can also be preparedaccording to art methods. See, e.g., Clark et al., U.S. Pat. No.6,121,416; and Garrard et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,750,373, 5,733,743,5,837,242, 5,969,108, 6,172,197, 5,580,717, and 5,658,727. Libraries ofpeptides and polypeptides fused to a heterologous protein component,such as a phage coat protein, are well known in the art, e.g., asdescribed in Clark et al. and Garrard et al., supra. Variants of a firstselected peptide or polypeptide binder can be generated by screeningmutants of the peptide or polypeptide to obtain the characteristics ofinterest (e.g., enhancing target binding affinity, enhancedpharmacokinetics, reduced toxicity, improved therapeutic index, etc.).For example a characteristic of interest can be ability to bind to Met,but reduced ability to activate HGF-related biological activities suchas cell proliferation, Met phosphorylation, cell migration, andangiogenesis. Mutagenesis techniques are well known in the art, andregions for mutation would be within the HGF β chain, in particularpositions associated with HGF β chain N-terminus insertion and/or βchain-β chain dimerization as described herein. Furthermore, scanningmutagenesis techniques (such as those based on alanine scanning) can beespecially helpful to assess structural and/or functional importance ofindividual amino acid residues within a peptide or polypeptide.

Determination of the ability of a candidate substance/molecule of theinvention to modulate HGF/c-met signaling and/or biological activitiesassociated with said signaling can be performed by testing themodulatory capability of the substance/molecule in in vitro or in vivoassays, which are well established in the art, e.g., as described inOkigaki et al., supra; Matsumoto et al., supra; Date et al., FEBS Let.(1997), 420:1-6; Lokker et al., supra; Hartmann et al., supra;Kirchhofer et al., J Biol. Chem. (2004), 279:39915-24; Stamos et al.(2004) EMBO J. 23: 2325-35; Kirchhofer et al., FEBS Lett. (2005) 579:1945-50; and Nakatsu et al. (Microvasc.Res. 66: 102, 2003).

HGF β Chain Antibodies

The present invention further provides methods comprising use ofantibodies. Exemplary antibodies include polyclonal, monoclonal,humanized, bispecific, and heteroconjugate antibodies.

1. Polyclonal Antibodies

The antibodies may comprise polyclonal antibodies. Methods of preparingpolyclonal antibodies are known to the skilled artisan. Polyclonalantibodies can be raised in a mammal, for example, by one or moreinjections of an immunizing agent and, if desired, an adjuvant.Typically, the immunizing agent and/or adjuvant will be injected in themammal by multiple subcutaneous or intraperitoneal injections. Theimmunizing agent may include an HGF β chain (or portion thereof) or afusion protein thereof. It may be useful to conjugate the immunizingagent to a protein known to be immunogenic in the mammal being immunizedExamples of such immunogenic proteins include but are not limited tokeyhole limpet hemocyanin, serum albumin, bovine thyroglobulin, andsoybean trypsin inhibitor. Examples of adjuvants which may be employedinclude Freund's complete adjuvant and MPL-TDM adjuvant (monophosphorylLipid A, synthetic trehalose dicorynomycolate). The immunizationprotocol may be selected by one skilled in the art without undueexperimentation.

2. Monoclonal Antibodies

The antibodies may, alternatively, be monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonalantibodies may be prepared using hybridoma methods, such as thosedescribed by Kohler and Milstein, Nature, 256:495 (1975). In a hybridomamethod, a mouse, hamster, or other appropriate host animal, is typicallyimmunized with an immunizing agent to elicit lymphocytes that produce orare capable of producing antibodies that will specifically bind to theimmunizing agent. Alternatively, the lymphocytes may be immunized invitro.

The immunizing agent will typically include the HGF β chain (or portionthereof) or a fusion protein thereof. Generally, either peripheral bloodlymphocytes (“PBLs”) are used if cells of human origin are desired, orspleen cells or lymph node cells are used if non-human mammalian sourcesare desired. The lymphocytes are then fused with an immortalized cellline using a suitable fusing agent, such as polyethylene glycol, to forma hybridoma cell [Goding, Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles andPractice, Academic Press, (1986) pp. 59-103]. Immortalized cell linesare usually transformed mammalian cells, particularly myeloma cells ofrodent, bovine and human origin. Usually, rat or mouse myeloma celllines are employed. The hybridoma cells may be cultured in a suitableculture medium that preferably contains one or more substances thatinhibit the growth or survival of the unfused, immortalized cells. Forexample, if the parental cells lack the enzyme hypoxanthine guaninephosphoribosyl transferase (HGPRT or HPRT), the culture medium for thehybridomas typically will include hypoxanthine, aminopterin, andthymidine (“HAT medium”), which substances prevent the growth ofHGPRT-deficient cells.

Preferred immortalized cell lines are those that fuse efficiently,support stable high level expression of antibody by the selectedantibody-producing cells, and are sensitive to a medium such as HATmedium. More preferred immortalized cell lines are murine myeloma lines,which can be obtained, for instance, from the Salk Institute CellDistribution Center, San Diego, Calif. and the American Type CultureCollection, Manassas, Va. Human myeloma and mouse-human heteromyelomacell lines also have been described for the production of humanmonoclonal antibodies [Kozbor, J. Immunol., 133:3001 (1984); Brodeur etal., Monoclonal Antibody Production Techniques and Applications, MarcelDekker, Inc., New York, (1987) pp. 51-63].

The culture medium in which the hybridoma cells are cultured can then beassayed for the presence of monoclonal antibodies directed against HGF βchain. Preferably, the binding specificity of monoclonal antibodiesproduced by the hybridoma cells is determined by immunoprecipitation orby an in vitro binding assay, such as radioimmunoassay (RIA) orenzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA). Such techniques and assaysare known in the art. The binding affinity of the monoclonal antibodycan, for example, be determined by the Scatchard analysis of Munson andPollard, Anal. Biochem., 107:220 (1980).

After the desired hybridoma cells are identified, the clones may besubcloned by limiting dilution procedures and grown by standard methods[coding, supra]. Suitable culture media for this purpose include, forexample, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium and RPMI-1640 medium.Alternatively, the hybridoma cells may be grown in vivo as ascites in amammal

The monoclonal antibodies secreted by the subclones may be isolated orpurified from the culture medium or ascites fluid by conventionalimmunoglobulin purification procedures such as, for example, proteinA-Sepharose, hydroxylapatite chromatography, gel electrophoresis,dialysis, or affinity chromatography.

The monoclonal antibodies may also be made by recombinant DNA methods,such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567. DNA encoding themonoclonal antibodies of the invention can be readily isolated andsequenced using conventional procedures (e.g., by using oligonucleotideprobes that are capable of binding specifically to genes encoding theheavy and light chains of murine antibodies). The hybridoma cells of theinvention serve as a preferred source of such DNA. Once isolated, theDNA may be placed into expression vectors, which are then transfectedinto host cells such as simian COS cells, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)cells, or myeloma cells that do not otherwise produce immunoglobulinprotein, to obtain the synthesis of monoclonal antibodies in therecombinant host cells. The DNA also may be modified, for example, bysubstituting the coding sequence for human heavy and light chainconstant domains in place of the homologous murine sequences [U.S. Pat.No. 4,816,567; Morrison et al., supra] or by covalently joining to theimmunoglobulin coding sequence all or part of the coding sequence for anon-immunoglobulin polypeptide. Such a non-immunoglobulin polypeptidecan be substituted for the constant domains of an antibody of theinvention, or can be substituted for the variable domains of oneantigen-combining site of an antibody of the invention to create achimeric bivalent antibody.

The antibodies may be monovalent antibodies. Methods for preparingmonovalent antibodies are well known in the art. For example, one methodinvolves recombinant expression of immunoglobulin light chain andmodified heavy chain. The heavy chain is truncated generally at anypoint in the Fc region so as to prevent heavy chain crosslinking.Alternatively, the relevant cysteine residues are substituted withanother amino acid residue or are deleted so as to prevent crosslinking.

In vitro methods are also suitable for preparing monovalent antibodies.Digestion of antibodies to produce fragments thereof, particularly, Fabfragments, can be accomplished using routine techniques known in theart.

Antibodies can also be generated by screening phage display librariesfor antibodies or antibody fragments that bind with suitable/desiredaffinity to HGF β chain (or equivalent). Such techniques are well knownin the art, for e.g., as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,750,373;5,780,279; 5,821,047;6,040,136; 5,427,908; 5,580,717, and referencestherein.

3. Human and Humanized Antibodies

The HGF β chain antibodies of the invention may further comprisehumanized antibodies or human antibodies. Humanized forms of non-human(e.g., murine) antibodies are chimeric immunoglobulins, immunoglobulinchains or fragments thereof (such as Fv, Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)₂ or otherantigen-binding subsequences of antibodies) which contain minimalsequence derived from non-human immunoglobulin. Humanized antibodiesinclude human immunoglobulins (recipient antibody) in which residuesfrom a complementary determining region (CDR) of the recipient arereplaced by residues from a CDR of a non-human species (donor antibody)such as mouse, rat or rabbit having the desired specificity, affinityand capacity. In some instances, Fv framework residues of the humanimmunoglobulin are replaced by corresponding non-human residues.Humanized antibodies may also comprise residues which are found neitherin the recipient antibody nor in the imported CDR or frameworksequences. In general, the humanized antibody will comprisesubstantially all of at least one, and typically two, variable domains,in which all or substantially all of the CDR regions correspond to thoseof a non-human immunoglobulin and all or substantially all of the FRregions are those of a human immunoglobulin consensus sequence. Thehumanized antibody optimally also will comprise at least a portion of animmunoglobulin constant region (Fc), typically that of a humanimmunoglobulin [Jones et al., Nature, 321:522-525 (1986); Riechmann etal., Nature, 332:323-329 (1988); and Presta, Curr. Op. Struct. Biol.,2:593-596 (1992)].

Methods for humanizing non-human antibodies are well known in the art.Generally, a humanized antibody has one or more amino acid residuesintroduced into it from a source which is non-human. These non-humanamino acid residues are often referred to as “import” residues, whichare typically taken from an “import” variable domain. Humanization canbe essentially performed following the method of Winter and co-workers[Jones et al., Nature, 321:522-525 (1986); Riechmann et al., Nature,332:323-327 (1988); Verhoeyen et al., Science, 239:1534-1536 (1988)], bysubstituting rodent CDRs or CDR sequences for the correspondingsequences of a human antibody. Accordingly, such “humanized” antibodiesare chimeric antibodies (U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567), wherein substantiallyless than an intact human variable domain has been substituted by thecorresponding sequence from a non-human species. In practice, humanizedantibodies are typically human antibodies in which some CDR residues andpossibly some FR residues are substituted by residues from analogoussites in rodent antibodies.

Human antibodies can also be produced using various techniques known inthe art, including phage display libraries [Hoogenboom and Winter, J.Mol. Biol., 227:381 (1991); Marks et al., J. Mol. Biol., 222:581(1991)]. The techniques of Cole et al. and Boerner et al. are alsoavailable for the preparation of human monoclonal antibodies (Cole etal., Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy, Alan R. Liss, p. 77(1985) and Boerner et al., J. Immunol., 147(1):86-95 (1991)]. Similarly,human antibodies can be made by introducing of human immunoglobulin lociinto transgenic animals, e.g., mice in which the endogenousimmunoglobulin genes have been partially or completely inactivated. Uponchallenge, human antibody production is observed, which closelyresembles that seen in humans in all respects, including generearrangement, assembly, and antibody repertoire. This approach isdescribed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,545,807; 5,545,806;5,569,825; 5,625,126; 5,633,425; 5,661,016, and in the followingscientific publications: Marks et al., Bio/Technology 10, 779-783(1992); Lonberg et al., Nature 368 856-859 (1994); Morrison, Nature 368,812-13 (1994); Fishwild et al., Nature Biotechnology 14, 845-51 (1996);Neuberger, Nature Biotechnology 14, 826 (1996); Lonberg and Huszar,Intern. Rev. Immunol. 13 65-93 (1995).

The antibodies may also be affinity matured using known selection and/ormutagenesis methods as described above. Preferred affinity maturedantibodies have an affinity which is five times, more preferably 10times, even more preferably 20 or 30 times greater than the startingantibody (generally murine, humanized or human) from which the maturedantibody is prepared.

4. Bispecific Antibodies

Bispecific antibodies are monoclonal, preferably human or humanized,antibodies that have binding specificities for at least two differentantigens. In the present case, one of the binding specificities is forHGF β chain, the other one is for any other antigen, and preferably fora cell-surface protein or receptor or receptor subunit.

Methods for making bispecific antibodies are known in the art.Traditionally, the recombinant production of bispecific antibodies isbased on the co-expression of two immunoglobulin heavy-chain/light-chainpairs, where the two heavy chains have different specificities [Milsteinand Cuello, Nature, 305:537-539 (1983)]. Because of the randomassortment of immunoglobulin heavy and light chains, these hybridomas(quadromas) produce a potential mixture of ten different antibodymolecules, of which only one has the correct bispecific structure. Thepurification of the correct molecule is usually accomplished by affinitychromatography steps. Similar procedures are disclosed in WO 93/08829,published 13 May 1993, and in Traunecker et al., EMBO J., 10:3655-3659(1991).

Antibody variable domains with the desired binding specificities(antibody-antigen combining sites) can be fused to immunoglobulinconstant domain sequences. The fusion preferably is with animmunoglobulin heavy-chain constant domain, comprising at least part ofthe hinge, CH2, and CH3 regions. It is preferred to have the firstheavy-chain constant region (CH1) containing the site necessary forlight-chain binding present in at least one of the fusions. DNAsencoding the immunoglobulin heavy-chain fusions and, if desired, theimmunoglobulin light chain, are inserted into separate expressionvectors, and are co-transfected into a suitable host organism. Forfurther details of generating bispecific antibodies see, for example,Suresh et al., Methods in Enzymology, 121:210 (1986).

According to another approach described in WO 96/27011, the interfacebetween a pair of antibody molecules can be engineered to maximize thepercentage of heterodimers which are recovered from recombinant cellculture. The preferred interface comprises at least a part of the CH3region of an antibody constant domain. In this method, one or more smallamino acid side chains from the interface of the first antibody moleculeare replaced with larger side chains (e.g. tyrosine or tryptophan)Compensatory “cavities” of identical or similar size to the large sidechain(s) are created on the interface of the second antibody molecule byreplacing large amino acid side chains with smaller ones (e.g. alanineor threonine). This provides a mechanism for increasing the yield of theheterodimer over other unwanted end-products such as homodimers.

Bispecific antibodies can be prepared as full length antibodies orantibody fragments (e.g. F(ab′)₂ bispecific antibodies). Techniques forgenerating bispecific antibodies from antibody fragments have beendescribed in the literature. For example, bispecific antibodies can beprepared can be prepared using chemical linkage. Brennan et al., Science229:81 (1985) describe a procedure wherein intact antibodies areproteolytically cleaved to generate F(ab′)₂ fragments. These fragmentsare reduced in the presence of the dithiol complexing agent sodiumarsenite to stabilize vicinal dithiols and prevent intermoleculardisulfide formation. The Fab′ fragments generated are then converted tothionitrobenzoate (TNB) derivatives. One of the Fab′-TNB derivatives isthen reconverted to the Fab′-thiol by reduction with mercaptoethylamineand is mixed with an equimolar amount of the other Fab′-TNB derivativeto form the bispecific antibody. The bispecific antibodies produced canbe used as agents for the selective immobilization of enzymes.

Fab′ fragments may be directly recovered from E. coli and chemicallycoupled to form bispecific antibodies. Shalaby et al., J. Exp. Med.175:217-225 (1992) describe the production of a fully humanizedbispecific antibody F(ab′)2 molecule. Each Fab′ fragment was separatelysecreted from E. coli and subjected to directed chemical coupling invitro to form the bispecific antibody. The bispecific antibody thusformed was able to bind to cells overexpressing the ErbB2 receptor andnormal human T cells, as well as trigger the lytic activity of humancytotoxic lymphocytes against human breast tumor targets.

Various techniques for making and isolating bispecific antibodyfragments directly from recombinant cell culture have also beendescribed. For example, bispecific antibodies have been produced usingleucine zippers. Kostelny et al., J. Immunol. 148(5):1547-1553 (1992).The leucine zipper peptides from the Fos and Jun proteins were linked tothe Fab′ portions of two different antibodies by gene fusion. Theantibody homodimers were reduced at the hinge region to form monomersand then re-oxidized to form the antibody heterodimers. This method canalso be utilized for the production of antibody homodimers. The“diabody” technology described by Hollinger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA 90:6444-6448 (1993) has provided an alternative mechanism formaking bispecific antibody fragments. The fragments comprise aheavy-chain variable domain (V_(H)) connected to a light-chain variabledomain (V_(L)) by a linker which is too short to allow pairing betweenthe two domains on the same chain. Accordingly, the V_(H) and V_(L)domains of one fragment are forced to pair with the complementary V_(L)and V_(H) domains of another fragment, thereby forming twoantigen-binding sites. Another strategy for making bispecific antibodyfragments by the use of single-chain Fv (sFv) dimers has also beenreported. See, Gruber et al., J. Immunol. 152:5368 (1994).

Antibodies with more than two valencies are contemplated. For example,trispecific antibodies can be prepared. Tutt et al., J. Immunol. 147:60(1991).

Exemplary bispecific antibodies may bind to two different epitopes onHGF β chain or to an epitope on HGF β chain and an epitope on anotherpolypeptide (e.g., c-met or HGF α chain).

5. Heteroconjugate Antibodies

Heteroconjugate antibodies are also within the scope of the presentinvention. Heteroconjugate antibodies are composed of two covalentlyjoined antibodies. Such antibodies have, for example, been proposed totarget immune system cells to unwanted cells [U.S. Pat. No. 4,676,980],and for treatment of HIV infection [WO 91/00360; WO 92/200373; EP03089]. It is contemplated that the antibodies may be prepared in vitrousing known methods in synthetic protein chemistry, including thoseinvolving crosslinking agents. For example, immunotoxins may beconstructed using a disulfide exchange reaction or by forming athioether bond. Examples of suitable reagents for this purpose includeiminothiolate and methyl-4-mercaptobutyrimidate and those disclosed, forexample, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,676,980.

6. Effector Function Engineering

It may be desirable to modify the antibody of the invention with respectto effector function, so as to enhance, e.g., the effectiveness of theantibody in treating cancer. For example, cysteine residue(s) may beintroduced into the Fc region, thereby allowing interchain disulfidebond formation in this region. The homodimeric antibody thus generatedmay have improved internalization capability and/or increasedcomplement-mediated cell killing and antibody-dependent cellularcytotoxicity (ADCC). See Caron et al., J. Exp Med., 176: 1191-1195(1992) and Shopes, J. Immunol., 148: 2918-2922 (1992). Homodimericantibodies with enhanced anti-tumor activity may also be prepared usingheterobifunctional cross-linkers as described in Wolff et al. CancerResearch, 53: 2560-2565 (1993). Alternatively, an antibody can beengineered that has dual Fc regions and may thereby have enhancedcomplement lysis and ADCC capabilities. See Stevenson et al.,Anti-Cancer Drug Design, 3: 219-230 (1989).

7. Immunoconjugates

The invention also pertains to immunoconjugates comprising an antibodyconjugated to a cytotoxic agent such as a chemotherapeutic agent, toxin(e.g., an enzymatically active toxin of bacterial, fungal, plant, oranimal origin, or fragments thereof), or a radioactive isotope (i.e., aradioconjugate).

Chemotherapeutic agents useful in the generation of suchimmunoconjugates have been described above. Enzymatically active toxinsand fragments thereof that can be used include diphtheria A chain,nonbinding active fragments of diphtheria toxin, exotoxin A chain (fromPseudomonas aeruginosa), ricin A chain, abrin A chain, modeccin A chain,alpha-sarcin, Aleurites fordii proteins, dianthin proteins, Phytolacaamericana proteins (PAPI, PAPII, and PAP-S), momordica charantiainhibitor, curcin, crotin, sapaonaria officinalis inhibitor, gelonin,mitogellin, restrictocin, phenomycin, enomycin, and the tricothecenes. Avariety of radionuclides are available for the production ofradioconjugated antibodies. Examples include ²¹²Bi, ¹³¹I , ¹³¹In, ⁹⁰Y,and ¹⁸⁶Re. Conjugates of the antibody and cytotoxic agent are made usinga variety of bifunctional protein-coupling agents such asN-succinimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithiol) propionate (SPDP), iminothiolane(IT), bifunctional derivatives of imidoesters (such as dimethyladipimidate HCL), active esters (such as disuccinimidyl suberate),aldehydes (such as glutareldehyde), bis-azido compounds (such as bis(p-azidobenzoyl) hexanediamine), bis-diazonium derivatives (such asbis-(p-diazoniumbenzoyl)-ethylenediamine), diisocyanates (such astolyene 2,6-diisocyanate), and bis-active fluorine compounds (such as1,5-difluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene). For example, a ricin immunotoxin canbe prepared as described in Vitetta et al., Science, 238: 1098 (1987).Carbon-14-labeled 1-isothiocyanatobenzyl-3-methyldiethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (MX-DTPA) is an exemplary chelating agent forconjugation of radionucleotide to the antibody. See WO94/11026.

In another embodiment, the antibody may be conjugated to a “receptor”(such streptavidin) for utilization in tumor pretargeting wherein theantibody-receptor conjugate is administered to the patient, followed byremoval of unbound conjugate from the circulation using a clearing agentand then administration of a “ligand” (e.g., avidin) that is conjugatedto a cytotoxic agent (e.g., a radionucleotide).

8. Immunoliposomes

The antibodies disclosed herein may also be formulated asimmunoliposomes. Liposomes containing the antibody are prepared bymethods known in the art, such as described in Epstein et al., Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82: 3688 (1985); Hwang et al., Proc. Natl Acad.Sci. USA, 77: 4030 (1980); and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,485,045 and 4,544,545.Liposomes with enhanced circulation time are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.5,013,556.

Particularly useful liposomes can be generated by the reverse-phaseevaporation method with a lipid composition comprisingphosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, and PEG-derivatizedphosphatidylethanolamine (PEG-PE). Liposomes are extruded throughfilters of defined pore size to yield liposomes with the desireddiameter. Fab′ fragments of the antibody of the present invention can beconjugated to the liposomes as described in Martin et al ., J. Biol.Chem., 257: 286-288 (1982) via a disulfide-interchange reaction. Achemotherapeutic agent (such as Doxorubicin) is optionally containedwithin the liposome. See Gabizon et al., J. National Cancer Inst.,81(19): 1484 (1989).

9. Pharmaceutical Compositions of Antibodies

Antibodies can be administered for the treatment of various disorders inthe form of pharmaceutical compositions.

If whole antibodies are used as inhibitors, internalizing antibodies arepreferred. However, lipofections or liposomes can also be used todeliver antibodies of the invention into cells where that is desired.Where antibody fragments are used, the smallest inhibitory fragment ispreferred. For example, based upon the variable-region sequences of anantibody, peptide and polypeptide molecules can be designed that retainthe ability to bind HGF β chain and/or interfere with interactionbetween HGF β chain and c-met, interfere with insertion of HGF β chainN-terminus, and/or interfere with HGF β chain-β chain interaction. Suchpeptides and polypeptides can be synthesized chemically and/or producedby recombinant DNA technology. See, e.g., Marasco et al., Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 7889-7893 (1993). The formulation herein may alsocontain more than one active compound as necessary for the particularindication being treated, preferably those with complementary activitiesthat do not adversely affect each other. Alternatively, or in addition,the composition may comprise an agent that enhances its function, suchas, for example, a cytotoxic agent, cytokine, chemotherapeutic agent, orgrowth-inhibitory agent. Such molecules are suitably present incombination in amounts that are effective for the purpose intended.

The active ingredients may also be entrapped in microcapsules prepared,for example, by coacervation techniques or by interfacialpolymerization, for example, hydroxymethylcellulose orgelatin-microcapsules and poly-(methylmethacylate) microcapsules,respectively, in colloidal drug delivery systems (for example,liposomes, albumin microspheres, microemulsions, nano-particles, andnanocapsules) or in macroemulsions. Such techniques are disclosed inRemington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, supra.

The formulations to be used for in vivo administration must be sterile.This is readily accomplished by filtration through sterile filtrationmembranes.

Sustained-release preparations may be prepared. Suitable examples ofsustained-release preparations include semipermeable matrices of solidhydrophobic polymers containing the antibody, which matrices are in theform of shaped articles, e.g., films, or microcapsules. Examples ofsustained-release matrices include polyesters, hydrogels (for example,poly(2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate), or poly(vinylalcohol)), polylactides(U.S. Pat. No. 3,773,919), copolymers of L-glutamic acid and γethyl-L-glutamate, non-degradable ethylene-vinyl acetate, degradablelactic acid-glycolic acid copolymers such as the LUPRON DEPOT™(injectable microspheres composed of lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymerand leuprolide acetate), and poly-D-(−)-3-hydroxybutyric acid. Whilepolymers such as ethylene-vinyl acetate and lactic acid-glycolic acidenable release of molecules for over 100 days, certain hydrogels releaseproteins for shorter time periods. When encapsulated antibodies remainin the body for a long time, they may denature or aggregate as a resultof exposure to moisture at 37° C., resulting in a loss of biologicalactivity and possible changes in immunogenicity. Rational strategies canbe devised for stabilization depending on the mechanism involved. Forexample, if the aggregation mechanism is discovered to be intermolecularS-S bond formation through thio-disulfide interchange, stabilization maybe achieved by modifying sulfhydryl residues, lyophilizing from acidicsolutions, controlling moisture content, using appropriate additives,and developing specific polymer matrix compositions.

The following are examples of the methods and compositions of theinvention. It is understood that various other embodiments may bepracticed, given the general description provided above.

EXAMPLES

Materials & Methods

HGF mutants were generated essentially as described in Kirchhofer etal., J Biol. Chem. (2004), 279:39915-24; Stamos et al. (2004) EMBO J.23: 2325-35. Met binding and MDA-MB435 cell migration assays wereperformed using reagents and methods as described in Kirchhofer et al.,supra. and Stamos et al., supra. Met phosphorlyation assays were carriedout using A549 cells essentially as described in Kirchhofer et al.,supra Inhibition of Met phosphorylation was carried out similarly exceptthat HGF mutants were added in a dose dependent manner to inhibitphosphorylation using 50 ng/ml HGF Inhibition of cell proliferation wascarried out in BxPC3 assays essentially as described in Kirchhofer etal., FEBS Lett. (2005) 579: 1945-50. In-vitro angiogenesis assay wascarried out essentially as described by Nakatsu et al. (Microvasc.Res.66: 102, 2003). The HGF mutants were added to the culture medium at aconcentration of 10 μg/ml every other day during a 6-day experiment. Atthe end of the experiment the number of sprouts per bead was quantifiedand expressed as the average±SD of 4 independent experiments.

Results

HGF β chain mutants (as β chain alone and as full-length HGF), havingthe mutations as indicated, were characterized for ability to bindMetIgG, in comparison to wild type HGF β chain (β chain alone andfull-length HGF) using a competition ELISA assay. In order to minimizeany potential disulfide-linked dimer formation, wild type HGF β and HGFβ chain mutants were made in the C604S background; thus wild type HGF βis actually HGF β C604S. In addition, selected full-length 2-chain HGFmutants were assessed in a cell migration assay to determine effects, ifany, on biological function, as a result of the mutations in the βchain. Results are depicted in FIG. 1A,B,C. HGF mutant G498I inhibitedHGF-dependent phosphorylation of Met in a dose dependent manner asdepicted in FIG. 2; results for HGF mutant R424A:R494E (single-chainHGF) are also shown. HGF mutants G498I and G498P activate Metsignificantly less well compared to wild type HGF in the Metphosphorylation assay as depicted in FIG. 3; results for HGF mutantR424A:R494E are also shown. HGF-dependent phosphorylation of Met wasmodulated in a dose dependent manner. Mutants HGF G498I and G498P alsoinhibited BxPC3 cell proliferation, having 2.5% and 56% of the activityof wild type HGF. Furthermore, selected full-length HGF mutants at aconcentration of 10 μg/ml (D672N, V495G, G498I, R424A:R494E) inhibitedangiogenesis in an in-vitro assay (FIG. 4), thus further confirming thesignificance of the HGF β chain (and selected mutations thereof) to theoverall biological function of HGF.

PARTIAL LIST OF REFERENCES

-   Angeloni, D., Danilkovitch-Miagkova, A., Miagkov, A., Leonard, E.    J., and Lerman, M. I. (2004). The soluble sema domain of the RON    receptor inhibits MSP-induced receptor activation. J. Biol. Chem.,    279, 3726-3732.-   Birchmeier, C., Birchmeier, W., Gherardi, E., and Vande Woude, G. F.    (2003). Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell    Biol. 4, 915-925.-   Boose, J. A., Kuismanen, E., Gerard, R., Sambrook, J., and    Gething, M. J. (1989). The single-chain form of tissue-type    plasminogen activator has catalytic activity: Studies with a mutant    enzyme that lacks the cleavage site. Biochemistry 28, 638-643.-   Bottaro, D. P., Rubin, J. S., Faletto, D. L., Chan, A. M.,    Kmiecik, T. E., Vande Woude, G. F., and Aaronson, S. A. (1991).    Identification of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor as the c-met    proto-oncogene product. Science 251, 802-804.-   Broze Jr., G. J. (2001). Protein Z-dependent regulation of    coagulation. Thromb. Haemost. 86, 8-13.-   CCP4 (1994). The CCP4 suite: Programs for protein crystallography.    Acta Crystallogr D50, 760-763.-   Chirgadze et al., FEBS Letters (1998), 430:126-129.-   Cohen, G. H. (1997). Align - a program to superimpose protein    coordinates, accounting for insertions and deletions. J Appl.    Crystallog. 30, 1160-1161.-   Cooper, C. S., Blair, D. G., Oskarsson, M. K., Tainsky, M. A.,    Eader, L. A., and Vande Woude, G. F. (1984a). Characterization of    human transforming genes from chemically transformed,    teratocarcinoma, and pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res.    44, 1-10.-   Cooper, C. S., Park, M., Blair, D. G., Tainsky, M. A., Huebner, K.,    Croce, C. M., and Vande Woude, G. F. (1984b). Molecular cloning of a    new transforming gene from a chemically transformed human cell line.    Nature 311, 29-33.-   Danilkovitch, A., Miller, M., and Leonard, E. J. (1999). Interaction    of macrophage-stimulating protein with its receptor. J. Biol. Chem.    274, 29937-29943.-   Danilkovitch-Miagkova, A., and Zbar, B. (2002). Dysregulation of Met    receptor tyrosine kinase activity in invasive tumors. J. Clin.    Invest. 109, 863-867.-   Date et al., FEBS Lett. (1997), 420:1-6.-   Dennis, M. S., Eigenbrot, C., Skelton, N. J., Ultsch, M. H.,    Santell, L., Dwyer, M. A., O'Connell, M. P., and Lazarus, R. A.    (2000). Peptide exosite inhibitors of factor VIIa as anticoagulants.    Nature 404, 465-470.-   Derksen, P. W., Keehnen, R. M. J., Evers, L. M., van Oers, M. H. J.,    Spaargaren, M., and Pals, S. T. (2002). Cell surface proteoglycan    syndecan-1 mediates hepatocyte growth factor binding and promotes    Met signalling in multiple myeloma. Blood 99, 1405-1410.-   Di Cera, E., Guinto, E. R., Vindigni, A., Dang, Q. D., Ayala, Y. M.,    Wuyi, M., and Tulinsky, A. (1995). The Na⁺ binding site of    thrombin. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22089-22092.-   Dickinson, C. D., Kelly, C. R., and Ruf, W. (1996). Identification    of surface residues mediating tissue factor binding and catalytic    function of the serine protease factor VIIa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.    USA 93, 14379-14384.-   Donate, L. E., Gherardi, E., Srinivasan, N., Sowdhamini, R.,    Aparicio, S., and Blundell, T. L. (1994). Molecular evolution and    domain structure of plasminogen-related growth factors (HGF/SF and    HGF1/MSP). Protein Sci. 3, 2378-2394.-   Drain, J., Bishop, J. R., and Hajduk, S. L. (2001).    Haptoglobin-related protein mediates trypanosome lytic factor    binding to Trypanosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 30254-30260.-   Gherardi, E., Youles, M. E., Miguel, R. N., Blundell, T. L., Iamele,    L., Gough, J., Bandyopadhyay, A., Hartmann, G., and Butler, P. J.    (2003). Functional map and domain structure of MET, the product of    the c-met protooncogene and receptor for hepatocyte growth    factor/scatter factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12039-12044.-   Hartmann, G., Naldini, L., Weidner, K. M., Sachs, M., Vigna, E.,    Comoglio, P. M., and Birchmeier, W. (1992). A functional domain in    the heavy chain of scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor binds the    c-Met receptor and induces cell dissociation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.    USA 89, 11574-11578.-   Hartmann, G., Prospero, T., Brinkmann, V., Ozcelik, C., Winter, G.,    Hepple, J., Batley, S., Bladt, F., Sachs, M., Birchmeier, C., et al.    (1998). Engineered mutants of HGF/SF with reduced binding to heparan    sulphate proteoglycans, decreased clearance and enhanced activity in    vivo. Curr. Biol. 8, 125-134.-   Hedstrom, L. (2002). Serine protease mechanism and specificity.    Chem. Rev. 102, 4501-4523.-   Huber, R., and Bode, W. (1978). Structural basis of the activation    and action of trypsin. Acc Chem. Res. 11, 114-122.-   Kunkel, T. A. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 82, 488-492.-   Kurosky, A., Barnett, D. R., Lee, T. H., Touchstone, B., Hay, R. E.,    Arnott, M. S., Bowman, B. H., and Fitch, W. M. (1980). Covalent    structure of human haptoglobin: a serine protease homolog. Proc.    Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 3388-3392.-   Lijnen, H. R., Van Hoef, B., Nelles, L., and Collen, D. (1990).    Plasminogen activation with single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen    activator (scu-PA). Studies with active site mutagenized plasminogen    (Ser⁷⁴⁰→Ala) and plasmin-resistant scu-PA (Lys¹⁵⁸→Glu). J. Biol.    Chem. 265, 5232-5236.-   Lin, C.-Y., Anders, J., Johnson, M., Sang, Q. A., and Dickson, R. B.    (1999). Molecular cloning of cDNA for matriptase, a matrix-degrading    serine protease with trypsin-like activity. J. Biol. Chem. 274,    18231-18236.-   Lokker, N. A., Mark, M. R., Luis, E. A., Bennett, G. L., Robbins, K.    A., Baker, J. B., and Godowski, P. J. (1992). Structure-function    analysis of hepatocyte growth factor: identification of variants    that lack mitogenic activity yet retain high affinity receptor    binding. EMBO J. 11, 2503-2510.-   Lokker, N. A., Presta, L. G., and Godowski, P. J. (1994). Mutational    analysis and molecular modeling of the N-terminal kringle-containing    domain of hepatocyte growth factor identifies amino acid side chains    important for interaction with the c-Met receptor. Protein Eng. 7,    895-903.-   Ma, P. C., Maulik, G., Christensen, J., and Salgia, R. (2003).    c-Met: structure, functions and potential for therapeutic    inhibition. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 22, 309-325.-   Malkowski, M. G., Martin, P. D., Guzik, J. C., and Edwards, B. F. P.    (1997). The co-crystal structure of unliganded bovine α-thrombin and    prethrombin-2: movement of the Tyr-Pro-Pro-Trp segment and active    site residues upon ligand binding. Protein Sci. 6, 1438-1448.-   Mark, M. R., Lokker, N. A., Zioncheck, T. F., Luis, E. A., and    Godowski, P. J. (1992).-   Expression and characterization of hepatocyte growth factor    receptor-IgG fusion proteins. Effects of mutations in the potential    proteolytic cleavage site on processing and ligand binding. J. Biol.    Chem. 267, 26166-26171.-   Matsumoto, K., Takehara, T., Inoue, H., Hagiya, M., Shimizu, S., and    Nakamura, T. (1991). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 181, 691-699.-   Matsumoto, K., Kataoka, H., Date, K., and Nakamura, T. (1998).    Cooperative interaction between α- and β-chains of hepatocyte growth    factor on c-Met receptor confers ligand-induced receptor tyrosine    phosphorylation and multiple biological responses. J. Biol. Chem.    273, 22913-22920.-   Maulik, G., Shrikhande, A., Kijima, T., Ma, P. C., Morrison, P. T.,    and Salgia, R. (2002). Role of the hepatocyte growth factor    receptor, c-Met, in oncogenesis and potential for therapeutic    inhibition. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 13, 41-59.-   Miller, M., and Leonard, E. J. (1998). Mode of receptor binding and    activation by plasminogen-related growth factors. FEBS Lett. 429,    1-3.-   Miyazawa, K., Shimomura, T., Kitamura, A., Kondo, J., Morimoto, Y.,    and Kitamura, N. (1993). Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of    the cDNA for a human serine protease responsible for activation of    hepatocyte growth factor. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 10024-10028.-   Naka, D., Ishii, T., Yoshiyama, Y., Miyazawa, K., Hara, H., Hishida,    T., and Kitamura, N. (1992). Activation of hepatocyte growth factor    by proteolytic conversion of single chain form to a heterodimer J    Biol. Chem. 267, 20114-20119.-   Nakamura, T., Nishizawa, T., Hagiya, M., Seki, T., Shimonishi, M.,    Sugimura, A., Tashiro, K., and Shimizu, S. (1989). Molecular cloning    and expression of human hepatocyte growth factor. Nature 342,    440-443.-   Naldini, L., Tamagnone, L., Vigna, E., Sachs, M., Hartmann, G.,    Birchmeier, W., Daikuhara, Y., Tsubouchi, H., Blasi, F., and    Comoglio, P. M. (1992). Extracellular proteolytic cleavage by    urokinase is required for activation of hepatocyte growth    factor/scatter factor. EMBO J. 11, 4825-4833.-   Okigaki, M., Komada, M., Uehara, Y., Miyazawa, K., and Kitamura, N.    (1992). Functional characterization of human hepatocyte growth    factor mutants obtained by deletion of structural domains.    Biochemistry 31, 9555-9561.-   Parry, M. A., Fernandez-Catalan, C., Bergner, A., Huber, R.,    Hopfner, K. P., Schlott, B., Guhrs, K. H., and Bode, W. (1998). The    ternary microplasmin-staphylokinase-microplasmin complex is a    proteinase-cofactor-substrate complex in action. Nat. Struct. Biol.    5, 917-923.-   Peek, M., Moran, P., Mendoza, N., Wickramasinghe, D., and    Kirchhofer, D. (2002). Unusual proteolytic activation of    pro-hepatocyte growth factor by plasma kallikrein and coagulation    factor XIa. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 47804-47809.-   Peisach, E., Wang, J., de los Santos, T., Reich, E., and Ringe, D.    (1999). Crystal structure of the proenzyme domain of plasminogen.    Biochemistry 38, 11180-11188.-   Perona, J. J., and Craik, C. S. (1995). Structural basis of    substrate specificity in the serine proteases. Protein Sci. 4,    337-360.-   Rawlings, N. D., O'Brien, E., and Barrett, A. J. (2002). MEROPS: the    protease database. Nucl. Acid Res. 30, 343-346.-   Renatus, M., Engh, R. A., Stubbs, M. T., Huber, R., Fischer, S.,    Kohnert, U., and W., B. (1997). Lysine 156 promotes the anomalous    proenzyme activity of tPA: X-ray crystal structure of single-chain    human tPA. EMBO J. 16, 4797-4805.-   Richardson, J. L., Kroger, B., Hoeffken, W., Sadler, J. E., Pereira,    P., Huber, R., Bode, W., and Fuentes-Prior, P. (2000). Crystal    structure of the human α-thrombin-haemadin complex: an exosite    II-binding inhibitor. EMBO J. 19, 5650-5660.-   Shimomura, T., Miyazawa, K., Komiyama, Y., Hiraoka, H., Naka, D.,    Morimoto, Y., and Kitamura, N. (1995). Activation of hepatocyte    growth factor by two homologous proteases, blood-coagulation factor    XIIa and hepatocyte growth factor activator. Eur J Biochem 229,    257-261.-   Stubbs, M., and Bode, W. (1993). A player of many parts: The    spotlight falls on thrombin's structure. Thromb. Res. 69, 1-58.-   Takeuchi, T., Shuman, M. A., and Craik, C. S. (1999). Reverse    biochemistry: use of macromolecular protease inhibitors to dissect    complex biological processes and identify a membrane-type serine    protease in epithelial cancer and normal tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci    USA 96, 11054-11061.-   Trusolino et al., FASEB J. (1998), 12:1267-1280.-   Trusolino, L., and Comoglio, P. M. (2002). Scatter-factor and    semaphorin receptors: cell signalling for invasive growth. Nature    Rev. Cancer 2, 289-300.-   Tsiang, M., Jain, A. K., Dunn, K. E., Rojas, M. E., Leung, L. L. K.,    and Gibbs, C. S. (1995).-   Functional mapping of the surface residues of human thombin. J.    Biol. Chem. 270, 16854-16863.-   Vijayalakshmi, J., Padmanabhan, K. P., Mann, K. G., and Tulinsky, A.    (1994). The isomorphous structures of prethrombin2, hirugen-, and    PPACK-thrombin: changes accompanying activation and exosite binding    to thrombin. Protein Sci. 3, 2254-2271.-   Wang, D., Bode, W., and Huber. R (1985). Bovine chymotrypsinogen A:    x-ray crystal structure analysis and refinement of a new crystal    form at 1.8 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 185, 595-624.-   Wang, D., Julian, F. M., Breathnach, R., Godowski, P. J., Takehara,    T., Yoshikawa, W., Hagiya, M., and Leonard, E. J. (1997). Macrophage    stimulating protein (MSP) binds to its receptor via the MSP β    chain. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 16999-17004.

1. An HGF/c-met antagonist molecule comprising an HGF mutant comprisinga mutation in HGF β chain N terminal region, wherein the mutation in HGFβ chain N terminal region is G498I, G498P, G498V, R502del plus T503del,or D672N.
 2. An HGF/c-met antagonist molecule comprising an HGF mutantcomprising a mutation in HGF β chain dimerization region, wherein themutation in HGF β chain dimerization region is N497R or K, G498A or S,P500W, H or E, or R502del.
 3. The HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim1 or 2, wherein the molecule comprises wild type amino acids atpositions 534, 578, 619, 673, 692, 693, 694, 695, 696, 699 and/or 702.4. The HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim 1, wherein the mutation inHGF β chain N terminal region is G498I.
 5. The HGF/c-met antagonistmolecule of claim 1, wherein the mutation in HGF β chain N terminalregion is G498P.
 6. The HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim 1,wherein the mutation in HGF β chain N terminal region is G498V.
 7. TheHGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim 1, wherein the mutation in HGF βchain N terminal region is R502del plus T503del.
 8. The HGF/c-metantagonist molecule of claim 1, wherein the mutation in HGF β chain Nterminal region is D672N.
 9. The HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim2, wherein the mutation in HGF β chain dimerization region is N497R. 10.The HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim 2, wherein the mutation inHGF β chain dimerization region is N497K.
 11. The HGF/c-met antagonistmolecule of claim 2, wherein the mutation in HGF β chain dimerizationregion is G498A.
 12. The HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim 2,wherein the mutation in HGF β chain dimerization region is G498S. 13.The HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim 2, wherein the mutation inHGF β chain dimerization region is P500W.
 14. The HGF/c-met antagonistmolecule of claim 2, wherein the mutation in HGF β chain dimerizationregion is P500H.
 15. The HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim 2,wherein the mutation in HGF β chain dimerization region is P500E. 16.The HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim 2, wherein the mutation inHGF β chain dimerization region is R502del.
 17. A nucleic acid encodingthe HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim
 1. 18. A method of making theHGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim 1, said method comprisingexpressing in a host cell a nucleic acid encoding the antagonistmolecule, and recovering the antagonist molecule.
 19. A nucleic acidencoding the HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim
 2. 20. A method ofmaking the HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim 1, said methodcomprising expressing in a host cell a nucleic acid encoding theantagonist molecule, and recovering the antagonist molecule.
 21. Anucleic acid encoding the HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim
 3. 22.A method of making the HGF/c-met antagonist molecule of claim 3, saidmethod comprising expressing in a host cell a nucleic acid encoding theantagonist molecule, and recovering the antagonist molecule.